A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Fair enough - just pointing out what has been discussed in the thread.geek said:strongbowholic said:It's not a City vs U***** thing though. This was all about the covenant in place when the field was bequeathed to Moston, the whole Planning Application process, the lack of transparency from Manchester Council from start to end - eg the cheap sale of the land, the funding, the impact to the environment and the impact to the community.geek said:i dont think they would no, but then thats just me maybe you'd need to do a survey of fCUM (i do really think they need to think about that abv tho!!) not all football fans still live in the 80's and want to cause trouble! what makes you think i couldnt get trouble from a fellow city fan?? coz i have!
i couldnt give a rats arse about a tiny club 7 leagues lower than city maybe i'll start worrying about fCUM if they get to the premier league.
let them have the bit of shit ground they want, i wonder how may of these people objecting to it will use the facilitys when they do make them??
no wonder were called bitters you lot give them just cause for it.
it's not as if its man utd moving there wanting to build a 90,000 seater is it, fair enough if it was and i'd be with you all the way.
All those things (if I read the thread correctly, apologies if I've not) were what caused concern and, in the view of the resident's campaign were not addressed sufficiently well to let this build go ahead.
if it was about the covenant in place and they liked\enjoyed the green space then i'd have no problem with fighting for it. but its a local tipping place and rubbish tip and full of fu*king dog shit if they enjoyed it look after it!!!
its a compleate joke and i'm embarassed about it, and it has been made a city vs united thing when they were doing collections out side mcfc robbing city fans when they have already been granted legal aid.
i've said my piece now and im finished with the whole debate. there going to get it one way or another.