No, he's shite, we want him to play. Besides, there's less chance of someone shattering the cunts leg if he's dropped.Eds said:Wouldn't it be wonderful if scum actually imposed thier own sanctions on him and didn't select him for three games.
Eds said:Wouldn't it be wonderful if scum actually imposed thier own sanctions on him and didn't select him for three games.
Ducado said:It's just the typical arrogance that gets me, the whole world can see what he did, it's as clear as daylight, I can only think he is worried about retrospective action from the FA (some chance) or that the watching world finally realises this is pretty typical of him, we saw it all the time at Everton sneaky little fouls
Although I must say that most Rags I know hope the FA do ban him and for longer than 3 games, he has to be one of the biggest wastes of money since they signed Alan Brazil
Eds said:Wouldn't it be wonderful if scum actually imposed thier own sanctions on him and didn't select him for three games.
In Super League incidents can be looked at after games and given suspensions on their own merit regardless of what the referee has done in the game.bluetonium said:Mate of mine said at the time that when something similar happened at some rugby game his club or nation banned the player for the rest of the tournament irrespective of what the authority decided.
Not saying that United should or would do the same, but at least the big sh1thouse could have come out and said sorry. At least we know he is a coward now, plain as day for all the world to see.
Still, it is a complete role reversal so maybe we should not be too aggrieved - we were there once, unable to complete on the pitch and resorting to tough tackling, Ball being the prime example. Only difference is our cloggers didn't cost €28m.