Marvin said:Ferguson rants work
Look at the MOTD pundits. The video evidence shows Rooney kicks the defender, and yet they reckon it's a pen. And Ferguson's main aim is not to show Utd were robbed, but to put pressure on the next set of officials set to officiate Man Utd matches. The FA should stop this
I don't think he looks the picture of health, but then again he's not 50 is he. He has always done these weekly rants, it's just that we've never been this close to them, so we now take notice of all his rants. The twat will still be knocking around in another 10 years - and until he stops managing those bastards they'll still be up there every single season.Mike N said:malg said:Well said. Every time I see threads like this it reminds me of that Mark Twain quote 'rumours of my death are greatly exaggerated' (replace 'demise' for 'death' in Ferguson's case).strongbowholic said:With all due respect, we've been saying all this for 10 years and the fucker is still in charge of the *****.
Well said? What the heck does that mean?
We havent been saying that he is cracking up for 10 years at all. He's on the way out now. His weekly rants suggests that the pressure is finally getting to him. He certainly wasnt like this 10 ago.
Do you think he looks well with his 'rhubarb and custard' complexion?
RyanP3609 said:Marvin said:Ferguson rants work
Look at the MOTD pundits. The video evidence shows Rooney kicks the defender, and yet they reckon it's a pen. And Ferguson's main aim is not to show Utd were robbed, but to put pressure on the next set of officials set to officiate Man Utd matches. The FA should stop this
To be fair to MOTD (for once), it was only that Murray and Hanson (don't get me started on him) that thought it was a pen. Pat Nevin actually said it wasn't a pen from the ref's view as you can see Rooney kick Caulker's leg. It was then the usual wankers to take the piss to try getting Nevin to change his mind. Nevin was right, but they just glossed over it and ignored the fact you can quite clearly see his leg move toward Caulker's.
But no mention what-so-ever of Fergie's rant, sure they showed it, but they didn't talk about it. If that would have been any other manager they'd have strung them up for a charge, talking about how you can't mention officials like that. I think Nevin was trying to get to that point but then Murray made some really shit joke to completely gloss over it and then quickly move on (something along the lines of asking Nevin to change his mind now whilst he can as it was a "Stonewall"). Usual unbiased approach from the MOTD team (Can't see Nevin being asked back on as from that game at least spoke mostly sense, even his analysis on utd's defending of Bale was 10 times better than anything I've seen Hanson analyze).
Pam, I've been on here for a bit and I tend to read people for a living, are you a rag?Pam said:RyanP3609 said:Marvin said:Ferguson rants work
Look at the MOTD pundits. The video evidence shows Rooney kicks the defender, and yet they reckon it's a pen. And Ferguson's main aim is not to show Utd were robbed, but to put pressure on the next set of officials set to officiate Man Utd matches. The FA should stop this
To be fair to MOTD (for once), it was only that Murray and Hanson (don't get me started on him) that thought it was a pen. Pat Nevin actually said it wasn't a pen from the ref's view as you can see Rooney kick Caulker's leg. It was then the usual wankers to take the piss to try getting Nevin to change his mind. Nevin was right, but they just glossed over it and ignored the fact you can quite clearly see his leg move toward Caulker's.
But no mention what-so-ever of Fergie's rant, sure they showed it, but they didn't talk about it. If that would have been any other manager they'd have strung them up for a charge, talking about how you can't mention officials like that. I think Nevin was trying to get to that point but then Murray made some really shit joke to completely gloss over it and then quickly move on (something along the lines of asking Nevin to change his mind now whilst he can as it was a "Stonewall"). Usual unbiased approach from the MOTD team (Can't see Nevin being asked back on as from that game at least spoke mostly sense, even his analysis on utd's defending of Bale was 10 times better than anything I've seen Hanson analyze).
Nevin was talking shit about the rags. Said they were magnificent. The man is a clown. His comments about the penalty were about the ref's view of it. He wasn't saying the decision was a correct one at all. He was merely saying he could understand why it wasn't given because the ref's view of it was obscured.
I for one hope he never is invited back. Bonus for me.
As for Fergie, I think he is genuinely afraid that having seen off the dippers, the chavs and the arse, City might be a bridge too far.
andyhinch said:Pam, I've been on here for a bit and I tend to read people for a living, are you a rag?Pam said:RyanP3609 said:To be fair to MOTD (for once), it was only that Murray and Hanson (don't get me started on him) that thought it was a pen. Pat Nevin actually said it wasn't a pen from the ref's view as you can see Rooney kick Caulker's leg. It was then the usual wankers to take the piss to try getting Nevin to change his mind. Nevin was right, but they just glossed over it and ignored the fact you can quite clearly see his leg move toward Caulker's.
But no mention what-so-ever of Fergie's rant, sure they showed it, but they didn't talk about it. If that would have been any other manager they'd have strung them up for a charge, talking about how you can't mention officials like that. I think Nevin was trying to get to that point but then Murray made some really shit joke to completely gloss over it and then quickly move on (something along the lines of asking Nevin to change his mind now whilst he can as it was a "Stonewall"). Usual unbiased approach from the MOTD team (Can't see Nevin being asked back on as from that game at least spoke mostly sense, even his analysis on utd's defending of Bale was 10 times better than anything I've seen Hanson analyze).
Nevin was talking shit about the rags. Said they were magnificent. The man is a clown. His comments about the penalty were about the ref's view of it. He wasn't saying the decision was a correct one at all. He was merely saying he could understand why it wasn't given because the ref's view of it was obscured.
I for one hope he never is invited back. Bonus for me.
As for Fergie, I think he is genuinely afraid that having seen off the dippers, the chavs and the arse, City might be a bridge too far.
Just thought I was shit at my job;)Pam said:andyhinch said:Pam, I've been on here for a bit and I tend to read people for a living, are you a rag?Pam said:Nevin was talking shit about the rags. Said they were magnificent. The man is a clown. His comments about the penalty were about the ref's view of it. He wasn't saying the decision was a correct one at all. He was merely saying he could understand why it wasn't given because the ref's view of it was obscured.
I for one hope he never is invited back. Bonus for me.
As for Fergie, I think he is genuinely afraid that having seen off the dippers, the chavs and the arse, City might be a bridge too far.
Busted.