Fernandinho

[Damanino]

Is Fernandinho in the Brazil squad for tonight game?

 

[soulmatic]

Is Fernandinho in the Brazil squad for tonight game?

would like to know this aswell

 

[Joehannes]

Is Fernandinho in the Brazil squad for tonight game?

would like to know this aswell

No.

 

[Rammy Blue]

Is Fernandinho in the Brazil squad for tonight game?

would like to know this aswell

No, he's not.

 

[SebastianBlue]

Is Fernandinho in the Brazil squad for tonight game?

would like to know this aswell

No, he's not.

I wouldn't use that as any indication. Brasil are on the creative side of their World Cup to World Cup pendulum swing--there are many good defensive-minded players being overlooked right now.

 

[BringBackSwales]

Is Fernandinho in the Brazil squad for tonight game?

would like to know this aswell

No, he's not.

glad I read this - I had seen the teams and was sure he was playing but just looked again, fucking Fernando

 

[Bill]

If we get Isco, Fernandinho and Navas we will be serious contenders for the CL next year.

Add thiago and cavani then BOOM!!! Unstoppable! :-)

goosebumps.

 

[Blueband Brother]

Ill make my position clear.

I am happy about the prospect of signing Thiago and Cavani but I have serious reservations and doubts about Isco,, Fernandinho and even navas (although I recognize that navas will give the team width).

 

[Mrmcfc]

Ill make my position clear.

I am happy about the prospect of signing Thiago and Cavani but I have serious reservations and doubts about Isco,, Fernandinho and even navas (although I recognize that navas will give the team width).

Right... Well thats errrr... Yeah, good?

 

[Blueband Brother]

Ill make my position clear.

I am happy about the prospect of signing Thiago and Cavani but I have serious reservations and doubts about Isco,, Fernandinho and even navas (although I recognize that navas will give the team width).

Right... Well thats errrr... Yeah, good?

Player.....................Good Scale (100%)
Bale.......................... 98
Fabregas.................... 75
Another bloody keeper.... 73
Thiago....................... 72
Cavani.......................69
De Rossi..................... 68
Novaretti.................... 65
Di Maria...................... 65
Navas......................... 49
Pepe........................... 45
Isco........................... 28
Ferdinandinho.................25
Hernanaes................. .. 21
Bernard..................... Unclassified

Manager
Pellegrini..................... 80

The rating is not entirely a reflection of the candidates talent but their level of benefit if they join the club.

Above 70% ( in my criteria) indicates an exceptional candidate (so examine the Bale score in context). Candidates scoring 65% and above will be qualified and predicted to make a POSITIVE impact to Manchester City, which is the whole point.

Below 40% - meh.

Unclassified- Wildcard candidate.


My opinion of course.

 

[Daz_Blue]

Ill make my position clear.

I am happy about the prospect of signing Thiago and Cavani but I have serious reservations and doubts about Isco,, Fernandinho and even navas (although I recognize that navas will give the team width).

Right... Well thats errrr... Yeah, good?

Player.....................Good Scale (100%)
Bale.......................... 98
Fabregas.................... 75
Another bloody keeper.... 73
Thiago....................... 72
Cavani.......................69
De Rossi..................... 68
Novaretti.................... 65
Di Maria...................... 65
Navas......................... 49
Pepe........................... 45
Isco........................... 28
Ferdinandinho.................25
Hernanaes................. .. 21
Bernard..................... Unclassified

Manager
Pellegrini..................... 80

The rating is not entirely a reflection of the candidates talent but their level of benefit if they join the club.

Above 70% ( in my criteria) indicates an exceptional candidate (so examine the Bale score in context). Candidates scoring 65% and above will be qualified and predicted to make a POSITIVE impact to Manchester City, which is the whole point.

Below 40% - meh.

Unclassified- Wildcard candidate.


My opinion of course.

So you think Novaretti is better than Pepe ?
What grade would the players earmarked to be replaced get ...... Dzeko, Lescott, Nasri, Pantillimon, Sinclair and Kolorov ?

 

[pudge]

[bigimg]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-wWiKKrt6BOo/UYHYbSC2K3I/AAAAAAAAEIc/8OO_t39jwGI/s320/Nathan-Fillion-Loss-For-Words-Reaction-Gif.gif[/bigimg]

 

[taconinja]

[bigimg]http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-wWiKKrt6BOo/UYHYbSC2K3I/AAAAAAAAEIc/8OO_t39jwGI/s320/Nathan-Fillion-Loss-For-Words-Reaction-Gif.gif[/bigimg]

 

[Blueband Brother]

Right... Well thats errrr... Yeah, good?

Player.....................Good Scale (100%)
Bale.......................... 98
Fabregas.................... 75
Another bloody keeper.... 73
Thiago....................... 72
Cavani.......................69
De Rossi..................... 68
Novaretti.................... 65
Di Maria...................... 65
Navas......................... 49
Pepe........................... 45
Isco........................... 28
Ferdinandinho.................25
Hernanaes................. .. 21
Bernard..................... Unclassified

Manager
Pellegrini..................... 80

The rating is not entirely a reflection of the candidates talent but their level of benefit if they join the club.

Above 70% ( in my criteria) indicates an exceptional candidate (so examine the Bale score in context). Candidates scoring 65% and above will be qualified and predicted to make a POSITIVE impact to Manchester City, which is the whole point.

Below 40% - meh.

Unclassified- Wildcard candidate.


My opinion of course.

So you think Novaretti is better than Pepe ?
What grade would the players earmarked to be replaced get ...... Dzeko, Lescott, Nasri, Pantillimon, Sinclair and Kolorov ?

1. As I clearly stated, the score does not reflect their talent but what I think is beneficial to the club for the future.

2. This good grade context is about possible player transfers not players currently in the squad.

If I want to grade current players, the criteria will be completely different even if they are graded on a 100% scale.

 

[kun]

Ill make my position clear.

I am happy about the prospect of signing Thiago and Cavani but I have serious reservations and doubts about Isco,, Fernandinho and even navas (although I recognize that navas will give the team width).

Right... Well thats errrr... Yeah, good?

Player.....................Good Scale (100%)
Bale.......................... 98
Fabregas.................... 75
Another bloody keeper.... 73
Thiago....................... 72
Cavani.......................69
De Rossi..................... 68
Novaretti.................... 65
Di Maria...................... 65
Navas......................... 49
Pepe........................... 45
Isco........................... 28
Ferdinandinho.................25
Hernanaes................. .. 21
Bernard..................... Unclassified

Manager
Pellegrini..................... 80

The rating is not entirely a reflection of the candidates talent but their level of benefit if they join the club.

Above 70% ( in my criteria) indicates an exceptional candidate (so examine the Bale score in context). Candidates scoring 65% and above will be qualified and predicted to make a POSITIVE impact to Manchester City, which is the whole point.

Below 40% - meh.

Unclassified- Wildcard candidate.


My opinion of course.

Novaretti 65% and Fernandinho 25% ???

Player.....................Good Scale (100%)
Bale.......................... 90
Reus .........................86
Vidal .........................80
Suarez .......................75
Cavani .......................75
Fabregas ....................72
Thiago .......................70
Fernandinho .................70
De Rossi .....................65
Di Maria .....................65
Navas ........................63
Hernanes ....................62
Isco ..........................60
Papadopoulos ...............55
Walcott ......................55
Abidal ........................40
Peruzzi .......................40
Pepe ..........................35
Byram .........................35
Bernard ....................Unclassified
Novaretti ..................Unclassified

Manager
Pellegrini......................75

 

[Le Havre Oswald]

the posters who are making the lists are 14 year old football manager fans right? if not then its VERY VERY SAD.

 

[Armaan]

the posters who are making the lists are 14 year old football manager fans right? if not then its VERY VERY SAD.

 

[Blueband Brother]

Right... Well thats errrr... Yeah, good?

Player.....................Good Scale (100%)
Bale.......................... 98
Fabregas.................... 75
Another bloody keeper.... 73
Thiago....................... 72
Cavani.......................69
De Rossi..................... 68
Novaretti.................... 65
Di Maria...................... 65
Navas......................... 49
Pepe........................... 45
Isco........................... 28
Ferdinandinho.................25
Hernanaes................. .. 21
Bernard..................... Unclassified

Manager
Pellegrini..................... 80

The rating is not entirely a reflection of the candidates talent but their level of benefit if they join the club.

Above 70% ( in my criteria) indicates an exceptional candidate (so examine the Bale score in context). Candidates scoring 65% and above will be qualified and predicted to make a POSITIVE impact to Manchester City, which is the whole point.

Below 40% - meh.

Unclassified- Wildcard candidate.


My opinion of course.

Novaretti 65% and Fernandinho 25% ???

Player.....................Good Scale (100%)
Bale.......................... 90
Reus .........................86
Vidal .........................80
Suarez .......................75
Cavani .......................75
Fabregas ....................72
Thiago .......................70
Fernandinho .................70
De Rossi .....................65
Di Maria .....................65
Navas ........................63
Hernanes ....................62
Isco ..........................60
Papadopoulos ...............55
Walcott ......................55
Abidal ........................40
Peruzzi .......................40
Pepe ..........................35
Byram .........................35
Bernard ....................Unclassified
Novaretti ..................Unclassified

Manager
Pellegrini......................75

Your opinion of course, we all have different criteria I guess.
My opinion for the players you added will be:
Suarez......80
Reus..........74
Vidal..........67
Papadopulous...60
Walcott......55
Peruzzi.......45
Abidal........33
Byram......unclassified (don't have a clue who that is)

My point is that I do not rate Ferdinandinho or Isco and Ill rather we buy a young talented defender that can develop for the future and also we go for real and qualified talent as you mentioned like vidal or de rossi to augment the mid field.<br /><br />-- Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:51 am --<br /><br />

the posters who are making the lists are 14 year old football manager fans right? if not then its VERY VERY SAD.

Its sad for you but not for me :D

 

[pudge]

Player.....................Good Scale (100%)
Bale.......................... 98
Fabregas.................... 75
Another bloody keeper.... 73
Thiago....................... 72
Cavani.......................69
De Rossi..................... 68
Novaretti.................... 65
Di Maria...................... 65
Navas......................... 49
Pepe........................... 45
Isco........................... 28
Ferdinandinho.................25
Hernanaes................. .. 21
Bernard..................... Unclassified

Manager
Pellegrini..................... 80

The rating is not entirely a reflection of the candidates talent but their level of benefit if they join the club.

Above 70% ( in my criteria) indicates an exceptional candidate (so examine the Bale score in context). Candidates scoring 65% and above will be qualified and predicted to make a POSITIVE impact to Manchester City, which is the whole point.

Below 40% - meh.

Unclassified- Wildcard candidate.


My opinion of course.

Novaretti 65% and Fernandinho 25% ???

Player.....................Good Scale (100%)
Bale.......................... 90
Reus .........................86
Vidal .........................80
Suarez .......................75
Cavani .......................75
Fabregas ....................72
Thiago .......................70
Fernandinho .................70
De Rossi .....................65
Di Maria .....................65
Navas ........................63
Hernanes ....................62
Isco ..........................60
Papadopoulos ...............55
Walcott ......................55
Abidal ........................40
Peruzzi .......................40
Pepe ..........................35
Byram .........................35
Bernard ....................Unclassified
Novaretti ..................Unclassified

Manager
Pellegrini......................75

Your opinion of course, we all have different criteria I guess.
My opinion for the players you added will be:
Suarez......80
Reus..........74
Vidal..........67
Papadopulous...60
Walcott......55
Peruzzi.......45
Abidal........33
Byram......unclassified (don't have a clue who that is)

My point is that I do not rate Ferdinandinho or Isco and Ill rather we buy a young talented defender that can develop for the future and also we go for real and qualified talent as you mentioned like vidal or de rossi to augment the mid field.

-- Mon Jun 03, 2013 12:51 am --

the posters who are making the lists are 14 year old football manager fans right? if not then its VERY VERY SAD.

Its sad for you but not for me :D

Yet using whatever criteria you have, you would rate the addition of Novaretti (28) more beneficial than that of Papadopoulos (21).

Didn't think it could be any more awkward and sad than it initially was, but bravo.

 

[NoahCity]

Any actual updates on Fernandinho transfer, would really like to see this guy sign.