BluessinceHydeRoad said:
I think these two were just as important a part of the Sheikh's building of the club as any player. The Sheikh promised a self-sustaining club capable of competing with Europe's elite out of its own resources. Involved in this were, quite clearly, the work done on increasing revenue streams, which has been so obviously successful. The on-the-pitch resources had to be developed and both Ferran and Txiki have played massive roles in this and roles which are continuous. I don't wish to decry the purchases made by our competitors this summer, but I doubt they are the product of the same massive professional competence that City show. I was impressed by two comments , one from our chairman and one from Ferran, this summer. Khaldoon said that it wasn't likely that we'd win every season, but we would go on getting better, and Ferran said that we didn't buy players on a season by season basis, but that we bought in cycles, some cycles were 3 years, some 4 and some 5. The last 2 windows have illustrated this perfectly. No "stellar" names have been bought, but big money has been spent to remedy what the manager considers to be weaknesses or gaps in the squad. The players are from the level below the stellar. Key to this is the process of identification, with Manuel and Txiki looking, not at who is "stellar", but at who plays football "the City way" better than anyone else. Then it's enter Ferran and the work on the transfer begins, not in August but rather in January so that if a deal is unlikely we can move on in plenty of time. City will not buy a player who does not strengthen the squad. So, last season Fernandinho and Navas came in very early in the window, Negredo and Jovetic not much later, and only MDM on the last day of the window. This season was world cup year but the players have been brought in well before the start of the season. Even Mangala, whose transfer involved very complicated third party ownership issues, was completed before the start of the domestic season. This completes one cycle - the squad is complete and may last for five years, but the process of renewal - the next cycle - is already well under way. City's is a smooth, efficient and competent operation in every aspect of the club's work because it has recruited top quality people to do that work.
Great post as always Blue. It's another point Ferran makes in his book, talent is the most important thing, then balance and motivation. We clearly already had a very talented squad last year, but perhaps not the most balanced. We were a little bit short in terms of depth in central midfield and centre back. Those issues have been addressed this summer. We have a starting centre back, and squad players in central midfield, right back and goalkeeper which give the squad a fantastic depth / balance.
With the recent long term contracts signed for the core of our team, it seems we see their cycle lasting a few more years yet. I would hope if we win the league this season, it gives us the platform to bring in youngsters like Lopes, Zucculini, Denayer and Inehacho next season. Integrate them in to the squad to learn from the experienced masters.
If you look at the Shite's squad after they won the league in 2013 to now and compare it to ours, and the relative transfer activity of each club, the difference is astounding. They've spent £165m net, we've spent £107m net. They've panic bought players like Mata and Fellaini who do not fit in to the way they played at the time. They've now completely changed their "Philosophy" (to a 352 or some variation of it) and will have to spend the next 2 years re-balancing the squad to fit the new system. This is the problem when you have an all-powerful manager who dictates style of play and transfer activity. Great when he's there 26 years, when he's not, it costs you a fortune to re-balance the squad to fit the new manager's philosophy.
By contrast, despite spending £60m less, because we have a DoF who dictates the footballing philosophy, it doesn't matter who the head coach is. We would have been scouting Mangala, Fernando, Inehacho, Zucculini etc no matter who was in charge of first team affairs. Our philosophy of playing high line, 4 at the back, possession football, means that the players we scout / buy and the manager we employ fit in to that system. It is perfect for succession planning, and working in "cycles".
I was a vocal critic in certain games last year when I felt we needed to alter our philosophy in certain games when we didn't have the personnel available to play that way. Chelsea at home being a prime example. I felt it was too early in our development to stick rigidly to the philosophy if it cost us points. I stand by that last season we weren't ready.
This season however, because of the depth of our squad, we have players who fit in to the philosophy when we have players injured. If Kompany was injured last year, Lescott wasn't suited to replace him in a high line because he's not quick enough. This year if Kompany gets injured, DeMichelis can step in, who proved last year that he was more than capable to play that system.
This season our squad has the
balance to be able to stick to our philosophy no matter who is available. Well done to Txiki for that.