You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Football Leaks/Der Spiegel articles
- Thread starter BlueDejong
- Start date
he should stick to table tennis
Inter Me Nan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 10,575
PEG said he had an inkling something was a foot...the throbber.have any British clubs said anything? or all stayed quiet?
M18CTID
Well-Known Member
PEG said he had an inkling something was a foot...the tax-evading hypocritical c*nt
Fixed that for you mate
ZanteWeatherman
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Jun 2009
- Messages
- 1,223
- Team supported
- Manchester City
Mike Keegan and Matt Lawton of the Mail. Huffing and puffing and saying fook all.Updated list of wankers - James Ducker, Castles, Nick Harris, Matthew Syed, everyone employed by BBC...who else am I forgetting?
Inter Me Nan
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 2 Aug 2012
- Messages
- 10,575
Cheers ha.Fixed that for you mate
squirtyflower
Well-Known Member
I’ve never been keen on Syeed’s overblown moralising
The Infantino stuff and the Fordham stuff is irrelevant, nothing to see here. It will whip the bedwetters into a frenzy of righteous indignation but there is nothing remotely wrong with our actions.
The sponsorships seems.to have a bit more about it, and may come back to bite us. But I'd be surprised, I suspect it's more about exploiting loopholes than breaking rules. And you can't get punished for exploiting loopholes.
Pep stuff, would surprise me if there was anything in it.
So a lot of drama but not much substance so far.
The sponsorships seems.to have a bit more about it, and may come back to bite us. But I'd be surprised, I suspect it's more about exploiting loopholes than breaking rules. And you can't get punished for exploiting loopholes.
Pep stuff, would surprise me if there was anything in it.
So a lot of drama but not much substance so far.
The image rights is legal as far as I can see. It was in our accountd as a related party ttransavtion, declared as a related party transaction and they assessed a fair market value for FFP as they are allowed to do under the regs.to what tune are we supposed to have "cheated"? the £12m top-up and the £30m image rights?
You could make a moral argument against it, and I'm sure we wouldn't have done it if we didn't need the income then and there. But moral arguments don't count for much when something complies with the letter of the law.