I think so too.
I think when the dust settles on all this, people will reflect that City had a plan of massive upfront investment in the football club financed by the owner. Our rivals didn't like it, took over UEFA's Financial Fair Play regulation, and structured it to cause maximum damage to City's business model. City were forced into realm of murky financial transactions trying to escape the trap that had been laid from us. When it looked like we had done so they moved the goal posts at the last minute. The subterfuge was foisted upon us.
But where are we now. By Der Spiegel's admission, "a profitable global empire", and I checked this morning favourites to win the Premier League and Champions League.
City should be a model for owner led investment in a football club. A great shame that this was not embraced by football, and that instead our rivals plotted to take us down, but I guess that was inevitable. It is dog eat dog.
I think a few people in the media may come to regret their comments. They failed to see the bigger picture and context in all this and took everything at face value.
What was FFP all about? Where did City come from, and where are we now? Playing beautiful football in a wonderful stadium with fantastic facilities and this is bad is it? To the extent that City were diverted by a year or more of subterfuge it was because another group in football were hell bent on stopping City's rise and context is everything.
I am hoping that some of the journalists who have hitherto declined to comment so far will approach the issue from this standpoint.