Your missing my point your previous post suggested you as a rep of us the fans cannot pass feedback to the very people the initiative was intended to bridge. As for my personal details if the information would benefit people who supported me then I’d feel I had a duty to share
I've looked through my notes and here's what was discussed at the formal meetings we've had.These have been largely single issue meetings where we've talked about a specific subject that's coming up and where we discussed the communications going out to fans.
We had 2 close together in May, mainly about tickets for the CL final, Everton & seasoncard renewal. All that information was communicated to fans by the club so there's nothing that was discussed in those meetings that you weren't told about via official communications.
We then had another meeting about 5 weeks ago, where we talked about mobile ticketing, Covid protocols (which weren't clear at that point) and got an update on the status/numbers of seasoncard renewals (information which the club specifically asked us not to share).
We've recently had a very informal meeting where we met the CFG COO and quite a number of other club staff from all areas. There were lots of individual conversations about various things, including the new pitch, the new advertising boards, rail seating, sustainability and other things. I can tell you we had a lot to say about the state of customer service and the way mobile ticketing was introduced. Again, there's nothing that would come as a surprise to anyone.
Hopefully, from now on, with all this crap over, meetings will be back to the normal format where we have items on the agenda suggested by both City Matters & the club, and which are minuted.
I agree that it's important that fans understand what's being discussed, as far as that's possible. But it's also important that the club feel they can speak freely to City Matters and us to them. If they only give us the bland, official, whitewashed view then that defeats the whole purpose of the exercise.