D
D
Deleted member 41424
Guest
needs to improve on his use of substitutions imo.
Hes doing a cracking job bar that for me...
Hes doing a cracking job bar that for me...
Thank goodness for the telegraphCompared to who we would have had... Fat Sam!
He is truly a very refreshing change.
Fat Sam would have taken Rooney as his captain.
Listened to the media and dropped Sterling and we would
have been back home weeks ago.
It's a miracle!
By bringing who on?needs to improve on his use of substitutions imo.
Hes doing a cracking job bar that for me...
It's the timing of them and the reasoning behind them.By bringing who on?
Like you say,its your opinion,fair enough.It's the timing of them and the reasoning behind them.
Rashford came on today at the 90min mark. Why?
Why not bring him on at 80 mins and save 10mins of Sterlings legs. Dier for Hendo was a smart sub. Would have preferred to see Cheek come on for Alli and keep us on the front font with the same formation.
The Delph sub in the Columbia game was a negative one, he came on to sit next to Hendo in front of the back 3 and it changed the momentum of the game and they eventually scored.
Southgate like to shit up shop whereas I prefer the attack is the best form of defence mentality...
Correct old cliche you can only beat what's in from you but Tunisia, Panama,Columbia , Sweden's oap club is hardly beating great opposition, thanks Jim for correcting meGetting a bit carried away. He has done well with a poor team and poor opposition.
Rashford, of course. Didn't you get the memo?By bringing who on?