A
A
Anonymous
Guest
Slightly different take on it in the Mirror from Simon Mullock:
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/simon-mullock/Why-Manchester-City-chief-executive-Garry-Cook-hasn-t-been-the-victim-of-a-media-witch-hunt-following-resignation-over-Nedum-Onouha-email-scandal-Simon-Mullock-column-article796723.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion ... 96723.html</a>
<a class="postlink" href="http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion/columnists/simon-mullock/Why-Manchester-City-chief-executive-Garry-Cook-hasn-t-been-the-victim-of-a-media-witch-hunt-following-resignation-over-Nedum-Onouha-email-scandal-Simon-Mullock-column-article796723.html" onclick="window.open(this.href);return false;">http://www.mirrorfootball.co.uk/opinion ... 96723.html</a>
The ink was hardly dry on Garry Cook's letter of resignation when I received a text illustrating what many Manchester City fans think of the episode that ended with their club searching for a new chief executive.
It was from my cousin, Andy, a season-ticket holder of some years who was rewarded for his blind faith last May when he saw City win their first trophy of his life.
It read: “Your brothers-in-arms have blood on their hands.”
When I asked Andy to explain, he replied: “It was a witch hunt. If it would have been Stoke's chief executive not a word would have been written. The email (sent by Cook) wasn't even offensive.”
So it seems that the electronic message that Cook mistakenly sent to Nedum Onouha's mother 11 months ago, which seemingly ridiculed her fight against cancer, wasn't to blame for his departure from the Etihad Stadium.
And it probably wouldn't have been had the City chief executive not tried to cover up his blunder by claiming his email account had been hacked. But my cousin isn't the only City fan who thought Cook has been unfairly treated by the media.
I spoke to other supporters and the feeling was widespread that journalists armed with stilettos started lining up behind Cook as soon as his message to Dr Onouha had been made public. But Cook was the architect of his own downfall – and I speak as someone who saw beyond the David Brent stereotype that people who had never met the man liked to use.
I spent a few hours in Cook's company when City were in Vancouver this summer. His vision for the future was one that took in all aspects of City's past and the way he handled the Carlos Tevez saga was a lesson that most other football administrators could learn from.
He was a nice bloke.
Now I've no doubt many people in my profession want City to fail, just like most rival supporters who used to have a soft spot for the Blues.
That's human nature. Why else would the Manchester United delegation at the recent Champions League draw in Monaco look at Cook and Co as if they were something they had just scraped off the bottom of their shoe?
But there's no media agenda against the club.
City are part of the elite now. They are no longer the poor little neighbours. They are the coming force of football. That's why Sheikh Mansour wants everything about the club to be world-class.
As a City fan half-jokingly said to me in the local: “It's not as if Cookie has been selling condemned meat to Manchester schools is it?”
No, and he hasn't even been caught peeping under the door of the women's toilets, either.
But he was right to resign.