Garry Cook resigns (merged)

Very sad to see Gary go. He did wonders for our club and was always approachable. Met him 3 times and he was always happy to chat. Just things like him joining the fans on the Santa Stroll last year. And I don't mean just starting people off I mean walking the route and happily talking to anyone that spoke to him. Imagine Peter Swales doing that ? I don't think so. He also was instrumental in Paul Lake being back and employed by the club. And those were the small things that we could see, what about all the stuff behind the scenes. Hope we get the same from whoever takes his position.

Whilst I have sympathy for Dr Onuoha's illness I find her behaviour incredible. And her comments that the email was worse than the day she was told she had cancer is ridiculous. Both my parents suffered with cancer and I can just imagine their response to that.

And as for the likes of Ian Wright, I have always hoped that one day he gets what he deserves.
 
LesBleuMiserable said:
I must admit I got this one wrong as had felt the whirlwind around Cook would not have gathered as much moment that it did. Whilst he has left position of CEO I hope the Board retain him in some capacity as I can see him still doing a fantatsic and continuing job of compliance re FFPR and stateside marketing of the business. The new man can focus on new revenue streams and "butter up" the media and UEFA.
Can't see it, because his latest gaffe wasn't in front of a camera he tried to hide it from the owners, doubt they'd trust him again.
 
LittleStan said:
I have missed something around the involvement of Ian Wright. Can somebody explain please?
Did a finger pointing piece about us in the sun with his arse perched on the morale high ground.
 
Gaylord du Bois said:
LittleStan said:
I have missed something around the involvement of Ian Wright. Can somebody explain please?
Did a finger pointing piece about us in the sun with his arse perched on the morale high ground.


a little bit more than that for me....he is close friends with ned & his family....imo, he advised neds mum to break the email story in his column of the sun as an exclusive.

again imo, he used neds mum to settle an old score with city
 
shadygiz said:
Gaylord du Bois said:
LittleStan said:
I have missed something around the involvement of Ian Wright. Can somebody explain please?
Did a finger pointing piece about us in the sun with his arse perched on the morale high ground.


a little bit more than that for me....he is close friends with ned & his family....imo, he advised neds mum to break the email story in his column of the sun as an exclusive.

again imo, he used neds mum to settle an old score with city
I did read that on here mate but presumed it was conjecture or has it been substantiated elsewhere ?
 
Gaylord du Bois said:
shadygiz said:
Gaylord du Bois said:
Did a finger pointing piece about us in the sun with his arse perched on the morale high ground.


a little bit more than that for me....he is close friends with ned & his family....imo, he advised neds mum to break the email story in his column of the sun as an exclusive.

again imo, he used neds mum to settle an old score with city
I did read that on here mate but presumed it was conjecture or has it been substantiated elsewhere ?


yup, it is conjecture, also very co-incidental
 
Rest assured that the club know the full story of who's behind all this. and it's possible that Cook isn't the only one who's told a little fib.

Could also be coincidence that this piece appeared the The National newspaper today;
http://www.thenational.ae/sport/football/the-jealous-stirring-the-pot-at-city

Exactly how many cooks does it take to spoil the broth?

In Manchester City's case, a growing lynch mob claimed the answer was just one: Garry Cook. The chief executive fell on his sword in the wake of a storm created by him apparently mocking a cancer sufferer via email.

Among those demanding his head in the broth pot is Ian Wright, the ex-Arsenal player. "How can anyone think it is possibly acceptable to joke about someone suffering from cancer," he asked before weighing in with the bromide: "You can have all the money in the world but you can't buy class." Seeing as Wright likes cliches so much, here is another: people in glass houses shouldn't throw stones.

As a player, Wright was reported to the English Football Association for verbally abusing a linesman with physical deformities. He might like to consider this before posing as a champion of the afflicted.

Cook has denied writing the email - he blames a hacker - but, even if he did, it has some key mitigating features. Most crucially, it was supposed to be a private message from Cook to his friend and City colleague, Brian Marwood. If genuine, it was not intended to be seen by Dr Anthonia Onuoha, who was representing her son in a contract dispute with City. She had e-mailed Marwood to say that while her "body might be ravaged by cancer and ongoing chemotherapy", she remained able to negotiate.

The response from Cook's account read: "Ravaged with it!! I don't know how you sleep at night. You used to be such a nice man when I worked with you at nike. G." Yes, the mail has a light-hearted tone, but it could easily be aimed at the black farce of the situation, not Dr Onuoha's misfortune.

Put yourself in Marwood's shoes. If you were playing hardball - that is, doing your job and representing the best interests of your club - with a cancer-stricken woman, how would you feel about it? Not great, I imagine.

What if she took the opportunity to remind you of her illness, using emotive words such as "ravaged"? Would you appreciate the support of your peers, even expressed as mock outrage at your perceived villainy? I would.

If Cook did write that email, then he was probably trying to cheer up a colleague who found himself in an unenviable position. If he foolishly sent it to the wrong person … well, he would not be the first.

What offends me more than this private "mockery" of Dr Onuoha's cancer is the unashamed readiness of others to use it as a weapon against City. These people are not really offended by a slightly jocular email. We have all said more crass things when we thought nobody was listening.

No, they are offended that Manchester City has dared to show ambition, and challenge football's established elite, including Ian Wright's beloved Arsenal. They are indignant that a lovable old punchbag like City has found a big pot of cash, and a brash chief executive who does not know his place - a chief executive who dares to dream of signing Kaka, beating Manchester United and staking a serious claim to the emerging markets of the east.

City does not have too many Cooks.

It just has plenty of jealous outsiders trying to stir the pot.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.