peoffrey said:
Skashion said:
I believe that's Marwood's department but ultimately the owner and Khaldoon's as well. Mostly I blame Hughes for buying old, supposedly 'proven', players like Bridge, for way over the odds. Made them impossible to get rid of at any price.
It's alright for you to make condescending comments about it saying a lot about the people who actually met him and found him to be a friendly and affable chap though?
Marwood is woefully out of his depth. There was no vacancy at City yet Cook pushed through a job for his old Buddy at Nike. Hopefully the new CEO will come in and realise how useless he is in terms of negotiating deals and contracts. You'd think an ex-Pro would actually know what he's talking about.
Cook just had good people skills and could turn his smile up whenever he needed to. In my business life, I've shook hands with people I can't stand and dealt with people I feel superior to - but I'm also fairly sure they didn't realise. At the end of the day, Cook bought the pints and posed for photos! More fool the fans who thought he was their friend.
I'm really not sure about Marwood. I had a negative opinion of him when he came, garnered from his time as a pundit, and the odd interview. I thought he was a cleverclogs, a smartypants, cut from the same cloth as Lawrenson.
I heard some negative stuff about him second and third hand, when he came, when he was seen as being treacherous by some of the playing staff. But that's been quiet for a couple of years, and players can be very bitchy.
Unlike Cook, it's difficult for me to speak definitively as he doesn't do interviews (or if he does I haven't seen them). Cook gave himself away as a clown most times he opened his mouth, but Marwood seems to have carved himself a niche at City. I'm not sure what that niche is, though. It will be interesting to see what happens when the new CEO comes in. Will he survive? Not sure.