Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 14,866
I'm not disputing that at all , but could you answer the question ?You would only need to spend half an hour in their company to come to the same conclusion I have.
I'm not disputing that at all , but could you answer the question ?You would only need to spend half an hour in their company to come to the same conclusion I have.
Whether it's new or not is surely a moot point?
Can I ask you this Bob, if a person in whatever country, just thinks the rate of net immigration into their country is simply happening too fast, due to services schools health care and housing not keeping up with demand, does that make them a racist?
Would be a fair point if TCI’s actions had actually caused the downfall of RBS. But they didn’t. Not in the slightest.You draw the line by not comparing someone being proactive in causing a situation that costs the country a fortune with someone being reactive to the situation that’s been caused. It’s not difficult.
Who do these people who want to hugely reduce immigration think we’re going to get the people to do those roles? There simply aren’t enough of them. It’s simple maths.Services, schools and health care etc pretty much run on immigrant labour. These sectors are among the main drivers of immigration. Remove services, education and health care and you would remove these drivers. So, not sure I understand the argument. Do you want services run properly? Education? Healthcare? Immigration is driven by need and demand. If the UK didn’t need the labour then immigration would be low.
That was the selling point of Brexit - immigration solely based on what we need. And that is precisely what we are getting. Immigration levels based on demand and need.
I answered it in post 2664.I'm not disputing that at all , but could you answer the question ?
I realise that, but if you dont grow those services they still come under more pressure. Housing is more acute demand is consistently outstripping supply is it not? OK there are other reasons that play into the lack of affordable housing but a growing population is undoubtedly the main one.Services, schools and health care etc pretty much run on immigrant labour. These sectors are among the main drivers of immigration. Remove services, education and health care and you would remove these drivers. So, not sure I understand the argument. Do you want services run properly? Education? Healthcare? Immigration is driven by need and demand. If the UK didn’t need the labour then immigration would be low.
That was the selling point of Brexit - immigration solely based on what we need. And that is precisely what we are getting. Immigration levels based on demand and need.
Who do these people who want to hugely reduce immigration think we’re going to get the people to do those roles? There simply aren’t enough of them. It’s simple maths.
Fair enough, personally I think it's a mixed grey area.I answered it in post 2664.
Maybe AI will save us!Fuck knows. Child labour, probably.
I'm certain it's not everyone - but there's a pretty strong connection.
I posted this yesterday. Voters were allowed to choose just the three most important issues that affected their vote.
With Reform, immigration is a massive outlier. And of all the parties, they're least concerned about the economy, healthcare, housing and education.
Yet, the seats where Farage, Anderson and Tice are standing, are some of the whitest in the country. At the last census, they were all around 96% white, compared with 81% for the UK as a whole.
There may be many explanations why people, who don't mean many immigrants, believe immigrants are the biggest issue in their lives, but racism would certainly be up there.
View attachment 122419