General Election June 8th

Who will you vote for at the General Election?

  • Conservatives

    Votes: 189 28.8%
  • Labour

    Votes: 366 55.8%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 37 5.6%
  • SNP

    Votes: 8 1.2%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 23 3.5%
  • Other

    Votes: 33 5.0%

  • Total voters
    656
Status
Not open for further replies.
Yes there are. They're called "the rich", who benefit from low taxes, have private medical insurance and send their kids to private school. They also make huge donations to the Tories and expect a payback when previously public services get privatised.

After my last whimsical reply, here's a more sensible one:

Are you honestly suggesting that only "the rich" agree with Conservative principles? I am sure you are just being flippant.

The rich do not "benefit" from low taxes. This is absolutely warped thinking. Someone on £500,000 a year pays 45% tax on most of their income (more than twice the rate of normal people) and has zero personal allowance. How can you possibly say this is them "benefitting" from low taxes??? These people contribute VASTLY more money that the medium-well off or the poor. Now you can argue if you like that the rich should pay EVEN more. That's fine, I understand that argument (though I don't agree with it). But please, let's keep the terminology right. You'd like them to pay EVEN more.

The private medical insurance they have, they pay for. The private school fees they pay, they pay for. The donations they may or may not make (the vast majority clearly make no donations at all) is their money. And what is this imaginary payback to which you allude?

I understand you have strong socialist principles, but honestly mate, it's starting to sound rather bitter if you don't mind me saying so.
 
Yes there are. They're called "the rich", who benefit from low taxes, have private medical insurance and send their kids to private school. They also make huge donations to the Tories and expect a payback when previously public services get privatised.
Oh yes, 45% income tax is incredibly low.
 
You're from Derry, you shouldn't need educating on these things. Bloody Sunday was an atrocity, some might even say terrorism when the British Army following instructions from the British Govt indiscriminately killed catholics on a civil rights protest. That is deplorable and was the catalyst for the worst of the troubles over next 26 years and encouraged many new Republicans to join the movement. Most people just want to call the IRA terrorist scum without ever understanding the sectarian state they lived in nor admitting that the British were partly responsible. Killing innocent people can never be accepted nor condoned but that doesn't mean you can't sympathise with the position they were in.

The last part of your post just shows what an aggressive poster you are and I'm done with you quite frankly. Every post is the same, you're the most defensive, highly strung poster I've ever seen on this forum and that is not an easy achievement.
I do not need lecturing on Bloody Sunday. The last part of my post was written after you called British soldiers/unionists murderers you now qualify that by reference to Bloody Sunday. You choose to ignore the carnage caused by the IRA gangsters. You know let's just leave it at that, but please do no lecture a person who lives in Derry about what goes on here, when all you know about it is from the leftie press errr let me guess is it the Guardian?
 
The donations they may or may not make (the vast majority clearly make no donations at all) is their money
As opposed to Labour who receive no donations from the unions as well. But that's fine obviously...

Boris Johnson shared something PB would not ally have been all over yesterday on Facebook. The Jewish News was pointing the promises made by various leaders to its readership. Well not all leaders, Corbyn had refused to speak to them for two years.
 
Oh yes, 45% income tax is incredibly low.

What would amuse me if it wasn't so ****ing infuriating is when McDonnell in particular talks about the government "giving" people money, when what he really means is TAKING LESS OF IT.

I've heard him specifically talk about people contributing to their pensions, being *subsidized* by the government, in that the government doesn't tax their pension contributions. It's totally sick thinking.
 
No it was a strawman and not remotely related to anything I had said. A bit like your post just now Fetters.
Now there's a fascinating observation!
I would agree with the content, but it lacks the cleverly barbed witticisms of said Fetters.
But you never know...
 
Stop playing games.

What, like talking about "asking the rich to pay their fair share", with the undertone implication that they are not, when in reality they contribute VASTLY more than everyone else already. Those sorts of games?

I'd like it if you stopped playing those games.
 
Makes me laugh, the discussions of economics with half remembered stats and folk spouting utter drivel based on often incorrect and misleading articles from the right wing press. Ultimately, if you're working class and vote Tory, you're a disgrace. It's that simple. No matter how you cut it.
 
Ultimately, if you're working class and vote Tory, you're a disgrace. It's that simple. No matter how you cut it.

Congratulations, perhaps the silliest post on the thread so far. Well done.
 
Last edited:
What would amuse me if it wasn't so ****ing infuriating is when McDonnell in particular talks about the government "giving" people money, when what he really means is TAKING LESS OF IT.

I've heard him specifically talk about people contributing to their pensions, being *subsidized* by the government, in that the government doesn't tax their pension contributions. It's totally sick thinking.

Mcdonnell has been kept very quiet around this election and that is because he is far too extreme for the majority of the electorate.

Watch any of his rallies on Youtube and you will understand why this lunatic cannot be allowed into power.

For him it isn't about establishing equality or doing any of the 'good' stuff, it is about essentially bringing down the whole existing institution to replace it with a socialist democratic state.
 
Reviewing your posts - I think you are Jacob Rees-Mogg ; )

I'm not his biggest fan if I am honest. And since I am a working class lad from Stockport, who went to the local comprehensive, I doubt he and I have a lot in common.
 
Mcdonnell has been kept very quiet around this election and that is because he is far too extreme for the majority of the electorate.

Watch any of his rallies on Youtube and you will understand why this lunatic cannot be allowed into power.

For him it isn't about establishing equality or doing any of the 'good' stuff, it is about essentially bringing down the whole existing institution to replace it with a socialist democratic state.

Absolutely correct. It's about ideology for him, irrespective of the consequences. I'd say the same about Jeremy, but I am not sure he's bright enough to understand the consequences.
 
Makes me laugh, the discussions of economics with half remembered stats and folk spouting utter drivel based on often incorrect and misleading articles from the right wing press. Ultimately, if you're working class and vote Tory, you're a disgrace. It's that simple. No matter how you cut it.
Here you go;

https://ig.ft.com/sites/numbers/economies/uk/

Bookmark it. Now nothing needs to be half remembered.

As for drivel, do a search of your own username in this thread and it will bring up your entire thread history. You've made a single cogent point.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top