markbmcfc
Well-Known Member
What's the point in keeping him if he won't play? Seems like we are pissing him off for the sake of it!?
Or, as is more likely, we're selling Mangala, keeping Denayer and won't be buying any more CB's.
What's the point in keeping him if he won't play? Seems like we are pissing him off for the sake of it!?
Or, as is more likely, we're selling Mangala, keeping Denayer and won't be buying any more CB's.
But still didn't play him when short of centre backs against arsenal?
What's the point in keeping him if he won't play? Seems like we are pissing him off for the sake of it!?
What's the point in keeping him if he won't play? Seems like we are pissing him off for the sake of it!?
I read it as until we know if mangala is off to Valencia or not,as denyar would probably be easier too shift than mangalaI read the "for now" bit, as until we get a replacement in.
Are you saying pep does or does not rate Denayer? hard to tell from your postDenayer should be sold with a buy back clause, it appears pep doesnt rate him so there is very little point keeping him around as he seems to be behind kompany, otamendi, stones, kolarov and fernando in the cb peaking order. Hopefully pep rates him but was unsure of his fitness going into the arsenal and couldnt risk him for a meaningless friendly with sunderland round the corner.