My thought process is more based on moving on Gundog & Kova this summer, & also with the uncertainty of what happens to Bernardo next summer.What's Rodri backup plan today? He's coming injury - he's not playing every minute. Nico G? Reijnders? Bernardo?
I didn't realize that but I'm guessing it was more out of necessity than choice.He's played it several times for WHU, but his skill set allowed him to create from deep too. I sense that's why Pep wanted him.
Perennial relegation candidates? They were in and won the Europa conference 2 seasons back, they have others who stood up in big games under Moyes, Bowen regularly produces for them, Kudus on his day has done.Mate, he was playing for David Moyes at perennial relegation candidates WHU. He's a class football player, not God.
Against tougher opponents, he was exclusively played as a CDM, so it's understandable that his full array of skills weren't on show when he was busy chopping trees.
Internet speculation is that City would still be interested at £25m. As a 27 year old Rodri back up, with proven PL experience, I'd be open to the possibility if it could be proven the betting issue hasn't broken him mentally.
Guehi + Isak. Nunez and elliot will be gone too.Chelsea getting €50m for Felix
Dippers getting £68m for Diaz
Wouldn’t be surprised if Dippers make one more big money signing
I think he's looked great against us. He led our midfield a merry dance at the Etihad, a few years ago.Joao Felix to Saudi for the same as what they paid for him. Claimed this would happen when they signed him and here we are.
Was always just a way for them to use up the extra available allocation for PSR that was afforded to them from the one-off sale of the hotel and spread it across multiple years by buying players they intend to sell on.
They've basically made a roughly £10m book profit on his sale that they get to carry forward into this accounting year and will be factored into the next 3.
This is why Chelsea are buying so many players and why they will continue to do so despite the comments and ridicule about their squad. it's how they prevent PSR being a problem once the one time sale of the hotel/women's team are no longer in the calculations. .
Where are all those people that were adamant he would have been a great signing? I was dead against it from the off and somewhat worryingly, I think only the betting scandal put us off. Goes missing in the big games, a distinctly average player that occasionally does something a bit flashy.
Worst kinda player. Doesn’t have a specific role. Don’t know what’s he’s actually good at. Barley consistent. Will look great on an edit but won’t win you a single game I can’t believe I wanted him after he joined ChelseaJoao Felix to Saudi for the same as what they paid for him. Claimed this would happen when they signed him and here we are.
Was always just a way for them to use up the extra available allocation for PSR that was afforded to them from the one-off sale of the hotel and spread it across multiple years by buying players they intend to sell on.
They've basically made a roughly £10m book profit on his sale that they get to carry forward into this accounting year and will be factored into the next 3.
This is why Chelsea are buying so many players and why they will continue to do so despite the comments and ridicule about their squad. it's how they prevent PSR being a problem once the one time sale of the hotel/women's team are no longer in the calculations. .
Where are all those people that were adamant he would have been a great signing? I was dead against it from the off and somewhat worryingly, I think only the betting scandal put us off. Goes missing in the big games, a distinctly average player that occasionally does something a bit flashy.
Flatters to decieve merchant of the highest orderWorst kinda player. Doesn’t have a specific role. Don’t know what’s he’s actually good at. Barley consistent. Will look great on an edit but won’t win you a single game I can’t believe I wanted him after he joined Chelsea
Oh sorry I was talking about Felix. Paqueta would’ve been great for us. Especially since Bernardo was supposed to leave. Great legs in midfield and was top 3 in through balls. He would actually feed Haaland. He’s dropped off but that’s because he prolly lost his hunger. Playing for such a bad team.Joao Felix to Saudi for the same as what they paid for him. Claimed this would happen when they signed him and here we are.
Was always just a way for them to use up the extra available allocation for PSR that was afforded to them from the one-off sale of the hotel and spread it across multiple years by buying players they intend to sell on.
They've basically made a roughly £10m book profit on his sale that they get to carry forward into this accounting year and will be factored into the next 3.
This is why Chelsea are buying so many players and why they will continue to do so despite the comments and ridicule about their squad. it's how they prevent PSR being a problem once the one time sale of the hotel/women's team are no longer in the calculations. .
Where are all those people that were adamant he would have been a great signing? I was dead against it from the off and somewhat worryingly, I think only the betting scandal put us off. Goes missing in the big games, a distinctly average player that occasionally does something a bit flashy.
Money launderingDiaz going to Bayern for €75m at 28 year old never a big player at Liverpool!
Might even try for Rodrygo if Isak doesn’t happenGuehi + Isak. Nunez and elliot will be gone too.
Sane and Muller gone, Musiala major injury. Diaz will score and assist 20+ in that league. frustrating that its going to fund Isak for themBayern have lost whatever they used to have.
Paying Liverpool back half the the Wirtz money for a player they don’t need and doesn’t improve them
Fuck me Leverkusen have sold all the best players Bayern don’t need anyone
Fair point on MusialaSane and Muller gone, Musiala major injury. Diaz will score and assist 20+ in that league. frustrating that its going to fund Isak for them
Diaz going to Bayern for €75m at 28 year old never a big player at Liverpool!
Do they? I think the prices are fairly reflective of the market. They're just getting market value, it's only compared to our prices that they look impressive because we've been selling under value for a whileChelsea have some brilliant negotiators on board. They get some ridiculous prices when they sell
Most transfer fees less than what's reported for sensationalismDo they? I think the prices are fairly reflective of the market. They're just getting market value, it's only compared to our prices that they look impressive because we've been selling under value for a while