stonerblue
Well-Known Member
Was a bit pissed off that Robertson didn't take the perfect opportunity to smash Rudiger about 20 minutes in.
25 years back makes that the year 2000. I’m talking about those players and others Dalgliesh et al. Since 1998 we never qualified for anything until two years ago, for the reason, we produce fuck all world class players, Not one.
None of the above qualified from the group stages of a major final.
Add on Dalglish,Souness,Strachan,Jordan and the likes.
Dalglish never turned up bar the odd game in three world cup finals.
Was a bit pissed off that Robertson didn't take the perfect opportunity to smash Rudiger about 20 minutes in.
Good post. No we did have players who would be pivotal for the best English teams. Now we have McGinn. I totally agree having a large population isn’t a guarantee of success, but it does help if your pool of youngsters playing is large. Great players are naturally gifted, so I don’t blame the coaches, they get the best out of them, but the best isn’t anywhere near good enough to compete.I do understand your points. But it's very hard for a country the size of Scotland to produce a national team with more than, say, two genuinely world class players in it. (From 1950 to 2000 the population was pretty steady at 5 million, it's gone up somewhat since then). That actually seems to me to be normal. Initially, that left me puzzled about the performance of the Netherlands. On looking it up, though, it turns out that they've had a hugely bigger population than Scotland right through the twentieth century (I knew it was bigger, of course, just not by that much). Population, of course, does not explain everything. Otherwise, the general uselessness of India and China in world football would be puzzling. But there's much more to it, as we know.
If anything, the real head scratcher, you could argue, is England. Not a single trophy since the one they hosted, now well over half a century ago. And only once in a final. Far larger population, tens of thousands of kids playing football every weekend throughout the land.
No, but I was really talking not about the national team, but about the influence of Scottish players in the English league. Whether the old First Division, or the first decade of the Premier League. It seems to me that every top club, for decades, had at least one or two important Scottish players in it. Players who had a real influence on the team. Or is this an illusion on my part?
I think this dates from the 1980’s. In Scotland there was a big teachers’ strike, so at the start did thet did a work to rule which meant after school classes on football stopped. Kids were not getting taught the basic skills of football at an early age. After the strike those after school classes basically never resumed. In addition, you never see kids playing football on the streets anymore because of the obvious traffic. I am 63 years old, and when I was a kid you played football with your mates with a small tennis ball on the streets, park, playgrounds, etc. it learned you to hone your ball skills. Never see that nowadays. Teachers gave up coaching so that was taken over by competitive dads, etc “ Get stuck in son!”. To me the demise of a Scottish football began from this.I do understand your points. But it's very hard for a country the size of Scotland to produce a national team with more than, say, two genuinely world class players in it. (From 1950 to 2000 the population was pretty steady at 5 million, it's gone up somewhat since then). That actually seems to me to be normal. Initially, that left me puzzled about the performance of the Netherlands. On looking it up, though, it turns out that they've had a hugely bigger population than Scotland right through the twentieth century (I knew it was bigger, of course, just not by that much). Population, of course, does not explain everything. Otherwise, the general uselessness of India and China in world football would be puzzling. But there's much more to it, as we know.
If anything, the real head scratcher, you could argue, is England. Not a single trophy since the one they hosted, now well over half a century ago. And only once in a final. Far larger population, tens of thousands of kids playing football every weekend throughout the land.
No, but I was really talking not about the national team, but about the influence of Scottish players in the English league. Whether the old First Division, or the first decade of the Premier League. It seems to me that every top club, for decades, had at least one or two important Scottish players in it. Players who had a real influence on the team. Or is this an illusion on my part?
Good post. No we did have players who would be pivotal for the best English teams. Now we have McGinn. I totally agree having a large population isn’t a guarantee of success, but it does help if your pool of youngsters playing is large. Great players are naturally gifted, so I don’t blame the coaches, they get the best out of them, but the best isn’t anywhere near good enough to compete.
We have been talking about this for decades. Is it kids have more choices and football has slipped? Possibly. To me though, those kids would never be players anyway, if you’re good at football as a kid, you love it. You want to play. I keep hoping for better players coming through.
This hope, I must confess, is a distance behind my “most likely to come true” hope, that Emily Blunt realises she’s made an arse of it with her film star husband, John Krasinky and we fuck fuck off to an island paradise, living off her Movie Star cash.
No **** would have us. And I don’t blame them.I think this dates from the 1980’s. In Scotland there was a big teachers’ strike, so at the start did thet did a work to rule which meant after school classes on football stopped. Kids were not getting taught the basic skills of football at an early age. After the strike those after school classes basically never resumed. In addition, you never see kids playing football on the streets anymore because of the obvious traffic. I am 63 years old, and when I was a kid you played football with your mates with a small tennis ball on the streets, park, playgrounds, etc. it learned you to hone your ball skills. Never see that nowadays. Teachers gave up coaching so that was taken over by competitive dads, etc “ Get stuck in son!”. To me the demise of a Scottish football began from this.
Also the Scottish domestic football is fucking awful league with Celtic/ Rangers very big fish with larger resources, in a very shallow puddle. The sooner they fuck off to somewhere else the sooner Scottish football flourishes again.
Even with a reduced pool, you would hope at least one emerged in the last twenty years. We are actually defying the Laws of Physics and the very fabric of spacetime itself. I’m just happy Einstein isn’t with us anymore.
Can't read too much into beating a just above amateur standard team.Yeah they look far better than the Germany that England beat in the last euros.
I know they only beat the sweaty socks but you can see they look a proper side. Decent depth to the squad too.