Scottish Cityzen
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Dec 2017
- Messages
- 2,859
I watched a clip from the sky sports app where ‘experts’ discussed who would get the best benefit from signing Donarumma. Three teams touted - rags, Chelsea and ourselves.Julien Laurens is a PSG and Arsenal supporter. He's been very critical of Pep and Manchester City since Haaland's decision to "stay humble" for Arteta. I listen to him every Monday on RMC French radio on the show "Charlie's Angels" from 8 p.m. to 10 p.m.
He knows nothing, he has no information, and seeing a rival like City strengthen is his last wish, as much as any Arsenal supporter would have!
Steve Sidwell stated that his signing would elevate Chelsea to being right in the mix for the title.
Someone else said he’d be a big boost to the rags with the other signings they’ve made.
No mention of City.
The Laurens character has always been a negative little twat about City so no surprise really. The fact he’s ’not good’ with his feet or on crosses is only a problem for City, the fact he’s great at keeping the ball out of the net is neither here nor there.
It’s like the mixed opinions on here - my personal initial feeling was that Eddie seeing out his contract with Trafford getting a gentle introduction to the club and a target of him being no.1 next season seemed a good plan.
However, if Eddie wants out now and the deal is there signing a keeper of this calibre is a no brainer.
We just need to tweak our style to accommodate.
