Girl savaged to death by dogs in Manchester

Why Always Ste said:
Not all owners of the Breeds of Dog in question are scrotes, or have these dogs as a status symbol "look at me I'm hard" thing.

I bought my Staffordshire bull Terrier from Pup 6yrs ago, purposely as a training partner, someone to motivate me in the morning and at night for long runs and I'd take him Cycling (yes he can cycle haha :P )

He has a set routine Tue-Thu-Sun where he goes on long walks, swimming in the lakes/rivers and as I type this he's fast asleep snoring his head off too tired to want to bite some kids head off as he is trained properly.

Food after exercise, he knows why he is exercising as he gets rewarded with food.

Dogs attack out of Fear. I purposely trained my Dog to not have this fear, which is why many dogs have attacked him and he's just brushed it off almost like he's just sparring.

Funny ain't it, the amount of Dogs that have attacked my dog, and they are usually the more "Pet" type breeds, the small Maltese, Pugs, Pomeranian types which Celebrities have made fashionable....

Because the owners have fear after seeing my Dog, their dogs detect this fear after the owners usually pick them up off the floor or go into anxiety/panic mode and before you know it their dogs are going sick and trying to attack my dog.

My Dog has yet to attack any other dog or human. it has however defended itself when all kinds of breeds have gone for it.

The problem with the Test/License system is many scrotes have their Dogs bred with illegal dogs...so they'll have a staffordshire bull terrier bred with an American Bull terrier (illegal)

And the Police will be none the wiser. they could have the license and pass the test, but they are walking the streets with a dog that's cross bred with an illegal breed.

My Staffie is full KC registered, has his breed history traced back over 100yrs and was bought from an home where the woman/Male lived with Children.

Sort out the money making scrotes who breed these dogs with no set standards, just breeding to make cash (dogs aren't socialised, just in cages) and you'll be a step closer to eliminating the vicious breeds that are bred with other breeds.

Don't buy your dogs from these people, buy dogs from loving homes.
Click to expand...

That's exactly how i buy my dogs and i recommend to everyone to do the same thing.
 
I just cannot see the point in owning any kind of dog that can cause the kind of damage things like bull mastiffs and staffies can unless you're in to hunting or something. Almost always seems to be the same type of people that own these dogs as well.

If you want a pet then get a cocker spaniel or a hamster.
 
It's the owners fault all the time but its the dog that always gets blamed! I know first hand that some dogs can be very dangerous in the wrong hands, thats why dog ownership of certain breeds should be regulated better. The answer is not to ban them. That just drives them underground into knobheads hands.

My Grandparents owned a Pit Bull before they were cool and was one of the friendliest dogs I have come accross in my life. It's just due t their physical abilties when they are abused or brought up wrong they are deadly.
 
wayne71 said:
I just cannot see the point in owning any kind of dog that can cause the kind of damage things like bull mastiffs and staffies can unless you're in to hunting or something. Almost always seems to be the same type of people that own these dogs as well.

If you want a pet then get a cocker spaniel or a hamster.
Click to expand...

Re-read my post above Wayne...

Staffies are such loving animals, it's the human that infiltrates this breed and makes them disgusting.

I went to an house before I bought Otis (my staffie) in Rochdale.
This Pakistani guy hated dogs, he even said it, yet he owned a 2bed council house where nobody lived in it except rows of cages all full of staffies and other breeds.

His sole intention was to make profit.

Before I left I asked him: would you cross breed that Staffie woman you have with an American Pit for me? you'd sell those pups easy...

His reply? Yes no problem my friend,we can do business.
 
Ducado said:
johnmc said:
karen7 said:
doesn't matter what breed or if it was a loving family dog,people forget they can turn on you anytime.shocks me that folk leave young kids alone with dogs,although i see this is a 15yr old in this case
Click to expand...

For 4 dogs to act like this reflects on the owner not the dog regardless of the breed
Click to expand...

Certainly does!
Click to expand...

Have to agree. You only have to witness some of the charachters with their shave heads, hands down their trackies and head and neck tats to see the problem. They dont keep those dogs as a pet, its a weapon!
 
My dog's soft as shit, I regularly leave him with my nephew/neice, admittedly for no more than 5 minutes, just while I'm doing stuff around the house.

When we got him as a pup we were told while he was younger to do try to wind him up when he was eating, sleeping etc, pull on his ears and tail when he was eating, stuff like that, so now when my neice (18 months) will go upto him and climb all over him, grabbing at him whilst he is eating, he pays no attention to her. Both my neice and nephew will role around on the floor with him, sitting on him, lying on him and he just plays back or carries on trying to sleep.

I'm all for licensing dogs/owners, makes perfect sense. This is my first experience owning a dog and I'm confident he/I would pass any form of ownership test required.

It's how you bring the dogs up.

My aunty had a Staff, one of the softest dogs I have known, that's the way she was brought up, a family dog, not a status dog.

Not sure how any of that post was relevant, but my point being, people are cunts, not dogs.

I prefer my dog to most people.

Again, people are cunts.
 
Timmmmahhhh said:
My dog's soft as shit, I regularly leave him with my nephew/neice, admittedly for no more than 5 minutes, just while I'm doing stuff around the house.

When we got him as a pup we were told while he was younger to do try to wind him up when he was eating, sleeping etc, pull on his ears and tail when he was eating, stuff like that, so now when my neice (18 months) will go upto him and climb all over him, grabbing at him whilst he is eating, he pays no attention to her. Both my neice and nephew will role around on the floor with him, sitting on him, lying on him and he just plays back or carries on trying to sleep.

I'm all for licensing dogs/owners, makes perfect sense. This is my first experience owning a dog and I'm confident he/I would pass any form of ownership test required.

It's how you bring the dogs up.

My aunty had a Staff, one of the softest dogs I have known, that's the way she was brought up, a family dog, not a status dog.

Not sure how any of that post was relevant, but my point being, people are *****, not dogs.

I prefer my dog to most people.

Again, people are *****.
Click to expand...

Amen to that, and the whole post as well.
 
To me it will always be how the dog's are brought up and not what type of dog they are.

[youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_xsWyRyuZJI&list=UUsG8ibSlBfqo6eReDlgqeMw[/youtube]
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.