Hamann Pineapple said:He's not gone. he's still here. I'm in denial
Jump out before de crocodiles get you.
coat hat
Hamann Pineapple said:He's not gone. he's still here. I'm in denial
Hear, hear. You're 100% correct. Hopefully it's onwards and upwards for all concerned.BillyShears said:Now that it's official, have to say its a sad moment. Wish Balo all the best, I hope he goes on to be Italy's number 9 for years to come. Was always going to be a difficult fit City and him, but in flashes we saw brilliance on the pitch. I'll never forget last season's derby - probably along with Aguero's goal against QPR, Balo's opener was the famous tipping point Fbloke used to talk about. Truly defining moments.
stony said:Unknown_Genius said:I disagree with letting him go, think we could live to regret this, if no one comes replaces him.
We could replace him with a house brick and get just the same amount of effort. This will upset the hater haters but he didn't love you back and he didn't want to be here.
nijinsky's fetlocks said:Skashion said:He was very much a City type of player. That's why he was embraced. The daftness of Mario suits most of our fanbase to a tee, although of course there was always the Main Stand moaners, who have always needed a scapegoat. Up next, Nasri? Or Garcia?ifiwasarichfan said:30 goals in 75 games? Man of the Match in the Cup Final. A fantastic character and wonderful player who is still very young.
It Always feels more like City when we have a Nutjob on the payroll. Onwards and upwards but its a sad day.
I disagree.
The time when we could embrace a naturally gifted but temperamental and erratic player are long gone.
To compete with the best we need players who we can rely on,not those who will put in a shift when it suits,then let the side down at key moments,or go missing completely like he did in the first half of the derby match.
I agree that we will miss his unpredictability,but I'm not entirely sure that is a bad thing.
Sometimes being boringly consistent is enough.
Skashion said:Colin Bell stand?nijinsky's fetlocks said:I disagree.
The time when we could embrace a naturally gifted but temperamental and erratic player are long gone.
To compete with the best we need players who we can rely on,not those who will put in a shift when it suits,then let the side down at key moments,or go missing completely like he did in the first half of the derby match.
I agree that we will miss his unpredictability,but I'm not entirely sure that is a bad thing.
Sometimes being boringly consistent is enough.
Ah, I see you're familiar with your own modus operandi.nijinsky's fetlocks said:Attack the poster rather than deal with the content?
Unknown_Genius said:stony said:Unknown_Genius said:I disagree with letting him go, think we could live to regret this, if no one comes replaces him.
We could replace him with a house brick and get just the same amount of effort. This will upset the hater haters but he didn't love you back and he didn't want to be here.
I think we should have kept him until the end of the season. We're at a crucial stage, in contention for a double, and I feel the more options and depth we have, the better.