Gregg Wallace

More stories will inevitably appear and embarrass the BBC. Yet again the Corporation will be accused of doing nothing and just hoping to keep a sock on it…
Im not sure what they are meant to do when people only speak about stuff 10 yrs after the event. They obviously dont deliberately employ weirdos. What does happen though is people who get on telly become billy big bollocks. It needs calling out at the time if that is so, Shirley?
 
Im not sure what they are meant to do when people only speak about stuff 10 yrs after the event. They obviously dont deliberately employ weirdos. What does happen though is people who get on telly become billy big bollocks. It needs calling out at the time if that is so, Shirley?
The Beeb obviously don't vet properly. They also don't keep an eye on things as they happen either. The Beeb shouldn't be reliant on reports way longer after they happen. The institution reeks of incompetence.
 
There’s been mention of Bake off and remarks on that. No one called out about it?
Could it just be that the other channels can do/say what they want? Only the BBC is held accountable?
I am not condoning Wallace or anyone else and as I have never watched Bake off I wouldn’t know. However there is one programme on 4 or 5 where they are professional bakers and make the most elaborately decorated specimens and the innuendos on that is very noticeable. No one has ever called that programme out.
Just an observation.
 
Im not sure what they are meant to do when people only speak about stuff 10 yrs after the event. They obviously dont deliberately employ weirdos. What does happen though is people who get on telly become billy big bollocks. It needs calling out at the time if that is so, Shirley?

Usually these things do get called out at the time but the person who the accusations are against are so powerful nothing gets done. You can also bet that for every person brave enough to take the risk and make a complaint there will be plenty of others wanting to but they are too scared to do so.
Looking at a huge corporation like the BBC i would think there is a fair possibility people in positions of power do deliberately employ a few people of dubious character. A bit like Hollywood a lot will pee in the same pot.
That power corrupts and they start to feel they are untouchable. I'd say it's getting harder to cover such behaviour up these days but I've no doubt it still goes on and always will.
 
The Beeb obviously don't vet properly. They also don't keep an eye on things as they happen either. The Beeb shouldn't be reliant on reports way longer after they happen. The institution reeks of incompetence.
Ive got to disagree. How can they vet people who become twats after becoming famous in the way that this bloke did, and in the way that lots have? They become knobheads after they are famous. The calling out of these people has to depend upon who they are working with at the time, thats how all work places function, no? Otherwise how can managers deal with it. Vetting people before they get on the telly is great, if that can even happen which is probably word of mouth like any job. Dealing with misconduct as it happens is what any work place managers are for. If they arent told, what are they to do? Waiting for a pile on years after the event serves nobody.

And I think Gregg Wallace is a sad **** wannabe someone pretty dislikable Cockney ex barrow boy wanker who is the walking embodiment of a mid life crisis. Hes a twat, even before this, as proved by the cringy interview we all took the piss out of at the start of this thread.

This certainly isnt a BBC enabled problem, as if they look for these people and then cover up for them. The notion is ridiculous
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.