Gregg Wallace

  • Thread starter Thread starter Ric
  • Start date Start date
oldius said:
If you're getting your cock out in the workplace, you deserve to be sacked.
If you're getting your cock out in front of women thirty years your junior, when you occupy the position of power in the room, you're assuming an abusive position and deserve to be sacked.
I have no sympathy for this guy whatsoever.
Click to expand...
Ron Jeremy would have had a very different life if he abided by these rules!
 
GH64 said:
Yes. He is alleged to have said something and to have apologised immediately afterwards, He doesn’t remember the incident.
Click to expand...
dronefromsector7G said:
Have you ever been reminded of something you supposedly said or did from years ago, maybe when drunk, and you don’t remember ?
Click to expand...
I think it's just my poor interpretation of a shoddily written BBC web article.
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
That’s subjective and I think it’s likely the person who wrote that was white. And it depends in the context.

I’ve got black friends who aren’t remotely offended by certain terms and others who are bothered by exactly the same one.

I’m happy to revisit my view (as ever) if I’m provided with more particulars than what some **** at the BBC decides is extremely offensive to them.

I’m sure it will come out in the wash.
Click to expand...
Who is this imposter - has GDM been hacked!?! :-)
 
gordondaviesmoustache said:
I don’t know that, but I’ve assumed it was mildly racist rather than nasty or malicious. That certainly seems to be the flavour based on the putative reaction of the recipient. Sacking someone for a single, mildly racist comment where no criminal offence has seemingly been committed is OTT personally. People say inappropriate things in the workplace. It doesn’t mean they should lose their jobs for a single such instance, when there are alternatives available.

Also the passage of time since the incident, some seven years, should be another factor.
Click to expand...
Should the BBC be scaked for suggesting Torode resign citing mental health issues when he doesn't have any?

It does smack of virtue signalling.
 
mexico1970 said:
Are the BBC clearing the decks for a modern Eurovision type deviant revamp of the show where words like the over sexualised souffle are banned to be replaced by the neutral gender puffed up cheese alternative?
Click to expand...
Puffed? No, no, no, no...

Sounds a lot like something else we can't mention.
 
They need to clearly set out the facts of each and every single allegation of which they, the BBC, have found the presenters guilty.
Then, and only then, will I be in a position to come to my own verdict. (Wokey cunts...)
 
york away to this! said:
They need to clearly set out the facts of each and every single allegation of which they, the BBC, have found the presenters guilty.
Then, and only then, will I be in a position to come to my own verdict. (Wokey cunts...)
Click to expand...
Do they fuck.
What entitled twaddle.
I doubt they give a fuck what you, or anyone else, think.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top