It's not "buried" in the text. It's in a link on the page, which is to an article/report about the long term impacts beyond 2100. It's showing that this is inexorable and before we get to 25m over the next 2000 years, we will have to go through 1m, 2m, 3m, 4m, 5m, 6m, 7m.... You get the idea.Yet more sensationalist bullshit aimed at motivating hippies who won't read the detail but will fall for the melodrama, hook line and sinker.
Did you spot the predicted 25m sea level rise upon which the mass migrations are predicated?
And buried in the text, "OVER THE NEXT 2,000 YEARS."
I.e. fucking irrelevant because we might not even live on Earth by then.
Which is exactly what she told Congress to do. It seems you agree with her
But who’s the real freak – the activist whose determination has single-handedly started a powerful global movement for change, or the middle-aged man taunting a child with Asperger syndrome from behind the safety of their computer screens?
And that, of course, is the real reason why Greta Thunberg is so triggering. They can’t admit it even to themselves, so they ridicule her instead. But the truth is that they’re afraid of her. The poor dears are terrified of her as an individual, and of what she stands for – youth, determination, change.
Lots of people on here and in the public at large have a poor opinion of Jacob Rees Mogg. Look at the condemnation that tramp got from all quarters when he confronted one of Rees Mogg's small children and told him, " your daddy is a very nasty man".
It's not "buried" in the text. It's in a link on the page, which is to an article/report about the long term impacts beyond 2100. It's showing that this is inexorable and before we get to 25m over the next 2000 years, we will have to go through 1m, 2m, 3m, 4m, 5m, 6m, 7m.... You get the idea.
The report, published in the journal Nature Climate Change, notes most research looks at the impacts of global warming by 2100 and so misses one of the biggest consequences for civilisation - the long-term melting of polar ice caps and sea-level rise.
This is because the great ice sheets take thousand of years to react fully to higher temperatures. The researchers say this long-term view raises moral questions about the kind of environment being passed down to future generations.
The research shows that even with climate change limited to 2C by tough emissions cuts, sea level would rise by 25 metres over the next 2,000 years or so and remain there for at least 10,000 years - twice as long as human history. If today’s burning of coal, oil and gas is not curbed, the sea would rise by 50m, completely changing the map of the world.
So it's isn't "fucking irrelevant", at all.
As for "hippies". Grow the fuck up.
How old does she have to be before she ceases to be exploited in your book then? Do you consider Malala Yousefzai to be an exploited child too?Lots of people on here and in the public at large have a poor opinion of Jacob Rees Mogg. Look at the condemnation that tramp got from all quarters when he confronted one of Rees Mogg's small children and told him, " your daddy is a very nasty man".
I've already previously stated that I've nothing against Greta. It's the cynical exploitation I have a problem with.