Harry due in court on Monday 23rd January 2012 (merged)

Chris in London said:
M18CTID said:
Chris in London said:
Possible, not likely. From what I know of it (no much) the government hands down guidelines for sentences for particular crimes. So you start with the guideline, and you say 'okay, what makes this particular offence and this particular offender worse than the norm, and what makes them not so bad as most?'

Imagine you have a single mother with three children under 5 who has carried on claiming a benefit when she's no longer entitled to it so she can give her kids a slightly better standard of living. She got two grand from the DSS and now she's paid it back. Jail? I don't think so.

So the Judge might look at who the victim is, whether Arry has got form for tax evasion or other offences, the amount of the fraud, whether it's a one-off or an ongoing series of frauds and so on. So if 40 people all lose their jobs if he's sent down, he did it all on his accountant's advice, he admitted it when interviewed and he's paid back every peny plus interest and made a large donation to charity, maybe he gets a hefty fine and a suspended sentence.

I don't myself see that happening here, but you never know.

Ok, cheers mate. If a guilty verdict is reached, let's hope the judge is impartial in his sentencing ;)

Impartial? Bollocks to that, I want the Judge to be a dog-hating Arsenal fan with a hangover whose wife has just run off with Gareth Bale.

Well, that would be ideal lol. I meant impartial in terms of not going easy on him because he's a high profile football manager who is in the frame to be the next England boss.
 
Not looking good for Arry is it. I have just looked at the news and Mandaric and Arry have given different stories at every juncture.

Beyond that, threatening reporters who sussed them and accounts in his dogs name ffs hahahahahahahahahaha.

Bloody hell Arry mate, your going to fucking jail.
 
What has amazed me in this case, and that it's hardly been mentioned, is that the **** was getting a slice of the fee recieved on transfers in the first place!

Portsmouth went bust and if i remember correctly some smaller companies in Portsmouth didn't get paid cos he's taking money that in my opinion belongs to the club. Not surprising he's bought and sold a lot of players if he's got this in his contract all the time. Keane to Liverpool and back seemed dodgy enough (if he was the manager), Bent to Sunderland after he basically forced him to go plus i bet there are others.
 
TCIB said:
Not looking good for Arry is it. I have just looked at the news and Mandaric and Arry have given different stories at every juncture.

Beyond that, threatening reporters who sussed them and accounts in his dogs name ffs hahahahahahahahahaha.

Bloody hell Arry mate, your going to fucking jail.

Let's fucking hope so. Although Spurs are hardly my favourite opposition club, I've a bit more time for some of their fans these days. However, my dislike for 'Arry far outstrips any dislike for Spurs and their fans (with the possible exception of that clown Chichester from Glory Glory lol)<br /><br />-- Tue Jan 24, 2012 3:19 pm --<br /><br />
Burnage Burnsy said:
What do Spuds do if he gets say 3 years like Lester Piggott did?

Sack him?

Keep his job open?

They'd surely sack him.
 
How many players have revolved round the Portsmouth/Tottenham turnstiles?
How many agreements might there have been between a manager and a player, or player's agent, which the revenue haven't been able to uncover?
Who are the agents for:-
Crouch
Defoe
Bent
Kabul
Keane
Kjrancar
Chimbonda
7 off the top of my head, but, maybe there are many more.
Maybe something will emerge regarding these. Always seemed very fishy to me.
 
Burnage Burnsy said:
What do Spuds do if he gets say 3 years like Lester Piggott did?

Sack him?

Keep his job open?


surely sack him if it were to cover at least a seaon... if not they have to get some bloody comfy chairs for him when he gets out!
 
Copied from a post on a main page thread entitled "on a lighter note..."

I had a verbal run in with Rob Beasley earlier this season (just a bit of banter over his comments on that 'Four Twats and a Croissant' Sunday Suppliment programme) and although he is a grade A turd to his credit he did stand his ground and was willing to have a sensible discussion with me - well as sensible as he could, given his limited intellect.

If I've understood this latest development correctly, then Twitcher is totally bollocked in an almost perfect Detective Columbo type maneuver.

Columbo: "So this payment was a bung Mr Rednapp?"
Twitcher: "Certainly not detective, this was legitmate income, honestly earnt. How dare you even suggest that it was a bung"
Columbo: "So sorry Mr Rednapp, please forgive me, my mistake. Sorry for troubling you"
Columbo moves to the door to leave. Just as he gets to the door he stops and turns round.
Columbo: "Just one last thing Mr Rednapp, so if this wasn't a bung then you will have paid tax on it then. Correct?"
Twitcher: "oh fuck...."

Well done Rob Beasley. Game, set and match. I take back everything I ever said about you. Top man.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.