You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Thenumber1blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 5,904
City virtually let everything there's no truth inCity wouldn’t let a yellow ticker on sky say we bid 100m for Kane if there was no truth in it would they? Yep there loads a speculation on players but this was different!
City wouldn’t let a yellow ticker on sky say we bid 100m for Kane if there was no truth in it would they? Yep there loads a speculation on players but this was different!
Not so sure, I think they would.
There was also nothing from Spurs either, to say they 'rejected' an offer, which made me doubt one had been made.
The claim came from Castles mentioning it in his podcast, then mentioning it again when nobody reacted to it, then tweeting it when he realized he got away with it, to a few then retweeting it and sky then using it to fill a slow news day.
The club have been so quiet with how they go about business that I honestly don't take denial of a rumour as that rumour being true.
BillyShears
Well-Known Member
nobody knows
Oh they do. It's just that unfortunately Kane isn't sexy, and therefore there's is an intense amount of denial going on about our business. This is no different to KDB or Sterling. Our target is clear, and so is the process of signing him.
Thenumber1blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 5,904
Like they were clear when we signed Dias ?Oh they do. It's just that unfortunately Kane isn't sexy, and therefore there's is an intense amount of denial going on about our business. This is no different to KDB or Sterling. Our target is clear, and so is the process of signing him.
BillyShears
Well-Known Member
Like they were clear when we signed Dias ?
No, nothing like that. And really, it doesn't take a genius to work out the difference between last summer and this summer ... but here we are.
Thenumber1blue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Apr 2009
- Messages
- 5,904
So far it's the sameNo, nothing like that. And really, it doesn't take a genius to work out the difference between last summer and this summer ... but here we are.
No, nothing like that. And really, it doesn't take a genius to work out the difference between last summer and this summer ... but here we are.
There is much more of a difference between this and Kdb/Sterling transfers than there is between this and last summer.
BillyShears
Well-Known Member
City wouldn’t let a yellow ticker on sky say we bid 100m for Kane if there was no truth in it would they? Yep there loads a speculation on players but this was different!
City sent out an email last within 24 hours of the story in the Mail saying we were in for Lewandowski telling the press pack that they absolutely had no interest in him. They let it be known when they need to.
Notwithstanding that we're at the point where people who don't believe we are in for Kane or that he's the absolutely priority this summer for the 9 position, are basically akin to flat earthers ... funny shit.
What's the holdup? They ask as if the transfer isn't potentially our most important and most expensive since Aguero. Wouldn't expect anything to happen maybe even till we've played Spurs in first game of the season