Harry Kane

[Gumzy97]

 

[decmancity]

If he's got £160m for Kane, Levy will be carried out on the shoulders of the Spurs Board members.

Carry him straight to the bank to start paying off some of the debt.

 

[Shaffer92]

Great leader?

Uh, yeah?

 

[oakiecokie]

He obviously is involved in the fees, as the Director of Football.

Not so it appears.Another board member is involved directly with fees etc, as part of his financial Club remit and this was an article that I read some time ago.

 

[Damien10]

Uh, yeah?

Don’t see Kane as a leader at all.

 

[Mr-Mertle]

Aguero > Kane

Three years ago, yes.

 

[JCB001]

How does this affect the Grealish possible transfer

 

[Damien10]

Three years ago, yes.

Still is. That’s my opinion.

 

[ctid83]

Haaland is so much better
Poor signing

 

[CorporateBlue]

Never turned up when it mattered in his life, we have no problem putting several past dross every week as is his forte. Can't get excited about this one at all.

He's better than what we have, but for me I'm not sold on it. His age, his recent fitness/injury record, the giant fee. But the worst thing about this move is that it'll rule us out from moving for Halaand, and he may end up at a domestic rival within the next 12 months. And that's something we could really live to regret.

If Halaand wasn't a possibility that's the only way this move would make sense in my opinion.

Otherwise I feel we would've been alright even for a season with just Jesus and Torres up front if we needed to, with our usual false 9 options to cover too. Until making a move for Halaand next summer if he isn't available this.

If Halaand had rejected us and moved elsewhere already then you can justify the Kane move, can't see it otherwise.

Ffs, literally did a double take reading that. Right ray of sunshine you are ..