Carry him straight to the bank to start paying off some of the debt.If he's got £160m for Kane, Levy will be carried out on the shoulders of the Spurs Board members.
Uh, yeah?Great leader?
Not so it appears.Another board member is involved directly with fees etc, as part of his financial Club remit and this was an article that I read some time ago.He obviously is involved in the fees, as the Director of Football.
Don’t see Kane as a leader at all.Uh, yeah?
Three years ago, yes.Aguero > Kane
Still is. That’s my opinion.Three years ago, yes.
Ffs, literally did a double take reading that. Right ray of sunshine you are ..Never turned up when it mattered in his life, we have no problem putting several past dross every week as is his forte. Can't get excited about this one at all.
He's better than what we have, but for me I'm not sold on it. His age, his recent fitness/injury record, the giant fee. But the worst thing about this move is that it'll rule us out from moving for Halaand, and he may end up at a domestic rival within the next 12 months. And that's something we could really live to regret.
If Halaand wasn't a possibility that's the only way this move would make sense in my opinion.
Otherwise I feel we would've been alright even for a season with just Jesus and Torres up front if we needed to, with our usual false 9 options to cover too. Until making a move for Halaand next summer if he isn't available this.
If Halaand had rejected us and moved elsewhere already then you can justify the Kane move, can't see it otherwise.
I really hope so. It's going to be a big weight on his shoulders for the first few games of the season. An early hat-trick would do nicely.Wow no pressure Pep.
Will be the first player to ever score 40 goals in a Premier League season with us.
Please explain his so called "injury" record.I take it you are fully aware as to the number of PL games he has played over the last four seasons ?
Not for the next 5 years he doesn't.Aguero > Kane
I'd say a good signing, but may have been better.Haaland is so much better
Poor signing
It doesn't.How does this affect the Grealish possible transfer
It will be the cost of his wages on a 5year deal plus bonuses. So not “wrong “ just reported in a sly way to support a given narrative.He'll sign but there's no way it'll be 160m.
That's just the papers adding 60m on to outage all non City fans and subsequently sell papers.
City haven't told anyone all this has come from the Tottenham endI don't know. Nobody does unless they are involved in the contract negotiations, if there are any atm?
As for the £160mill transfer fee. Many on here have stated City won't pay £150mill for Kane. Now the Sun have upped that to £160mill. Lol!
Does anyone on here believe City will or have agreed to pay £160mill for Kane. Me neither.
There is no transfer news. Tabloids and their reporters are desperate. They will make anything up to get clicks, etc.
City do not tell any paper or their reporters about transfers. No one called out Dias last season. Not one!