Harry Kane

[Paul1970]

I would say the rumours aren't true, just the usual sunday filler article from a journo with nothing to write about so putting 2+2=5 with some logic that if you spend 100M you cannot spend another 100M so soon

Hope your right because going into the new without replacing kun is a massive mistake but I do think a striker will come in but not Kane .

 

[Keeper!]

If the rumours are true and by signing grealish we can’t afford Kane then how much money did we really have to spend in this window. We have recouped a fair bit from transfers already but can’t afford Kane .

Khaldoon is a straight hitter, he said we will replace Kun, keep the faith in the Main man.

 

[leo_city]

 

[Username Required]

 

[samuelyeboah]

city want kane and kane wants city, truly scintillating stuff. incredible scoop.

 

[leo_city]

city want kane and kane wants city, truly scintillating stuff. incredible scoop.

It is. The fact that there are now reports of a gentlemen's agreement to leave make it a decent scoop at the very least

 

[Damocles]

Hope your right because going into the new without replacing kun is a massive mistake but I do think a striker will come in but not Kane .

He is right mate. Even in the article he backtracked it.

 

[leo_city]

This is the start of PR battles for Levy

 

[Fordyboy46]

This will rumble on right until the last couple of days in the window, still seems a million miles away from anything happening

 

[Coatigan]

If the rumours are true and by signing grealish we can’t afford Kane then how much money did we really have to spend in this window. We have recouped a fair bit from transfers already but can’t afford Kane .

The rumours are there as build-up to the horror shock value when we Do sign both.