You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
EL APACHE TEVEZ
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 1 Sep 2008
- Messages
- 21,981
Kane will rock up on the 16th august mark my words, that peevish twat levy won’t want him playing against them.
BillyShears
Well-Known Member
Think Kane will surprise a few here and will really push this move through
That's my vibe too. I get the feeling that Harry is desperate for this move to come off. Plus he'll know that the onus will be on him to force it through.
come-on-barney
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 29 Aug 2007
- Messages
- 10,843
Kane holds all the cards. If he states his head is not in the right place to play and believes he had an agreement to leave, Nuno will be left without a striker and no money to purchase one. His value will drop and Levy will want the deal done. All down to him now to force it through.
samuelyeboah
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 May 2021
- Messages
- 5,493
- Team supported
- Manchester City
is it now? didn't we know kane *believes* he has a gentlemen's agreement for a while now?It is. The fact that there are now reports of a gentlemen's agreement to leave make it a decent scoop at the very least
The biggest obstacle to this transfer seems to me that Levy/Spurs have no intention of selling Kane. There was talk recently that Spurs would let Kane go but I am not sure I believe this. Do they look like a club that is planning on life without Kane? This could go on for 12 months because I don't see an alternative for City, and City won the league title last season without a striker so there's no need for City to move on. If Levy wants to play the long game, let him, he will lose.
Better to reiterate the reports, in what is seemingly an important week for his future, and that the narrative hasn't changed. It is good news, that's all.is it now? didn't we know kane *believes* he has a gentlemen's agreement for a while now?
Don't get this forum, post a source and 'we knew this!' post something like you know 'wheres the source pal' lol
Would rather we had Ings & Jesus up front this season and then went for Haaland next summer. Kane's going to be finished in 2/3 years because of his dodgy ankles and we're going to end up needing to spend another £100m to replace him. If we're going to spend stupid money on a striker I'd rather we spent it on someone who's 22 and has his whole career ahead of him rather than someone who's 28 and will likely be done before his contract expires.
I can't see him doing that and unfair to expect him to do so. Kane's future casts a giant shadow over their club. Let it hover there for a year if necessary. We can wait. We are the Champions. City can go again with this squad.Kane holds all the cards. If he states his head is not in the right place to play and believes he had an agreement to leave, Nuno will be left without a striker and no money to purchase one. His value will drop and Levy will want the deal done. All down to him now to force it through.
tolmie's hairdoo
Well-Known Member
The biggest obstacle to this transfer seems to me that Levy/Spurs have no intention of selling Kane. There was talk recently that Spurs would let Kane go but I am not sure I believe this. Do they look like a club that is planning on life without Kane? This could go on for 12 months because I don't see an alternative for City, and City won the league title last season without a striker so there's no need for City to move on. If Levy wants to play the long game, let him, he will lose.
They have spoken directly to Kane to say he can leave.
Has been told to keep his head down and leave it to the negotiators.