Harry Kane

i think he will behind the scenes mate if he has an agreement with levy. Haaland is only starting out in his career but Kane knows this is his last chance of a big move to win trophies and he will also know that it would be his only chance to come to us as if we sign another striker this summer then he`s stuck at spuds.
Dealing with Daniel is a nightmare, Raiola may be easier!!
 
Going back to his home city, he would be Spurs main man and maybe money.
Sterling's been up north for longer than he was in London at this point. And if Spurs are willing to pay the 300k a week Sterling is on now, let alone the wage rise he'd need to even consider taking that step down, I'll run through Ardwick stark bollock naked.
 
Both Haaland and Kane have positives/negatives, but both would be great signings and improve us considerably.

Haaland, young exciting talent, could be our striker for the next 10 years, against, dealing with a known 'bad" agent, unproven in the Premier league, a big lad already at 20, will he have issues later in his career?

Kane, proven top quality Premier league player, England Captain, great penalty taker, against, questionable ankles, dealing with Daniel Levy and one that's not mentioned often, 'Arry is a London boy through and through, will heading norf be good for him?
Some of us survived for three years without any noticeable side effects.
 
Sterling's been up north for longer than he was in London at this point. And if Spurs are willing to pay the 300k a week Sterling is on now, let alone the wage rise he'd need to even consider taking that step down, I'll run through Ardwick stark bollock naked.

I don't believe Sterling is paid £300k a week either.
 
This saga is already reminding me of Alexis Sanchez.
North London star player agitating to leave, club unwilling to sell at a price that looks half decent..
 
This saga is already reminding me of Alexis Sanchez.
North London star player agitating to leave, club unwilling to sell at a price that looks half decent..
Will be different so long as Kane really does only have eyes for us. If he starts to talk to United we will walk away. I suspect we have been in contact with his people got the green light and after champions league final we will start to negotiate with levy. Like we found with sane if the player only wants to go to one club it is incredibly hard for the selling club. Im Sure Kane will do his part
 
If we get Kane id honestly never be worried about pens again.

He has missed only 2 penalties in the last 4 years. While scoring roughly 30 in that same time frame. Thats a 94% converstion rate almost as sure as you can get for the volume of pens.

The 2 misses during that time 1 came for England the other vs Liverpool in a 2-2 draw at Anfield. Where he scored another penalty to draw the game in the 95th min.

Basically if we get 10 pens a season we are scoring 9 to 10 of those a season every year.

Kane should go to the Rags then... on pens alone he’d win the Golden Boot every year.
 
Kane would be at best a short term stop gap. I'd say pay no more than £50m with a 2 year contract on a maximum of 80% KDBs salary.

City: Hello is that Mr Levy, it’s Manchester City Football Club here, we are interested in purchasing your star striker... one Harry Kane. We understand Mr Kane has expressed an interest in joining us and we propose a transfer fee of £50 million pounds.... hello.....hello...Mr Levy.... are you still there.... Mr Levy ... hello....operator.....hello..... The lines gone dead..... I think the bounder hung up...
 
I'm not really convinced Kane would fit into Pep's system. Does he do enough running and pressing from the front? I also don't think anyone will be spending the money required to sign him.

I can't see a swap deal happening as who'd want to go the other way? I'd rather be a squad player at City than a regular for mid-table spurs?
 
To be the main man, he is getting to the age where he wants regular game time, with us nothing more than a squad player and if we go and buy a world class striker, next season he may well get less minutes on the pitch.

Great lad, always gives his all , but is he good enough?
I am a massive fan of Jesus and I always thought the plan was for him to replace Aguero. It doesn't look like that is going to happen and in fairness, he probably hasn't shown enough in front of goal to force Peps hand. I do wonder what he will think about City chasing another main man and him not moving up the pecking order.

To fund a move for Kane/Haaland might see someone leaving the club unexpectedly and I think the three main candidates are Jesus, Sterling and Laporte. Of the three, I would get rid of Sterling but I expect either of the other two are more likely.
 
City: Hello is that Mr Levy, it’s Manchester City Football Club here, we are interested in purchasing your star striker... one Harry Kane. We understand Mr Kane has expressed an interest in joining us and we propose a transfer fee of £50 million pounds.... hello.....hello...Mr Levy.... are you still there.... Mr Levy ... hello....operator.....hello..... The lines gone dead..... I think the bounder hung up...
Well that's all he's worth IMHO. He's not the youngest, his ankles are knackered and he gets away with stuff because he's the Ingerland captain, which wouldn't happen if he joined City
 
City: Hello is that Mr Levy, it’s Manchester City Football Club here, we are interested in purchasing your star striker... one Harry Kane. We understand Mr Kane has expressed an interest in joining us and we propose a transfer fee of £50 million pounds.... hello.....hello...Mr Levy.... are you still there.... Mr Levy ... hello....operator.....hello..... The lines gone dead..... I think the bounder hung up...
Hello it’s arse wenger here and I will bid £51 millions euro :)
 
Some have been spoiled with our best players staying with us over the years. It has skewed their view and given them the belief that a player spending 10+ years with a single club is the norm. It isn't. I don't believe for a second that Haaland spends the rest of his career with us if we sign him, and if we got 5 years out of him we would have done well. Of course, after 5 years of Haaland we can get a fee back on his sale, which we wont get with Kane. Its whether or not the club determine this is a deciding factor in who we drop £100m+ on.
With the kane option,the sell on with Haaland could be negated/matched by the emergence of Delap.He wouldnt cost us a penny if we are clever with loans,or minimal if its a buyback,and he will only be 22.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top