Big Dave Watson
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 25 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 2,378
NoYou can't come on here without the yes/no you're famous for.
What's it going to be Dave yes or no? ;)
NoYou can't come on here without the yes/no you're famous for.
What's it going to be Dave yes or no? ;)
Nooooooooooooo.
It's a good idea, but needed to be done 2-5 years before Kun left, not six months after. So yes, we need to buy a finished product rather than potential
Perhaps, but exactly which one of City, Utd, Chelsea & Liverpool do you plan on KOing ?
You could put Messi into your side alongside Kane and you still wouldn't finish top 4.We could replace the one out of these four who has a bad season.
I don't understand why it is so fantastical. We have done it on several occasions recently. After all we agreed that we'll have a £160m striker that you cant afford leading our line...
I’ll be watching Dave, reckon you could be wrong this time. :)
To be fair how would Nuno have any clue what is needed for a top 4 finish in England?We agree. The deal will collapse. Both sides are too far apart.
Of course now there are greater financial threats to Spurs but I am certain that the business plan does not require us to sell Kane or play in the Champions League. Nor do I think we are completely shit. I am sure the new manager is telling Levy we have a better than a puncher's chance of the making the top four.
To be fair, it was done 2-5 years before Kun left, and the result is Gabby Jesus. The reality is that 99% of any youngsters you bring in are not going to become world class. They might become good squad players, but replacing Aguero requires the best in the world.It's a good idea, but needed to be done 2-5 years before Kun left, not six months after. So yes, we need to buy a finished product rather than potential