We've walked away before.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
Guess so but never nice seeing someone disregarded like that.
Hate people that take advantage of a ‘gentleman’s agreeement’ and never think twice
Me too but we have no proof that actually happened just paper talk which we know by the way they lie about is is usually bollocks.
BamberBridgeBlue
Well-Known Member
Quite right. £100 million is a silly bid. He’s a depreciating asset in a post / present COVID world. £85 million tops.If you were a City fan before 2008, you will understand that football clubs don't need to have any point beyond serving their local community and wider fan base.
The market is already inflated. Levy has every justification to believe that £100m is a silly bid.
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 18,291
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
How long for? at least it will clear any dandruff ;-)As delighted as I am with Grealish, if we can't afford to sign Kane and end up £50-£60m short I will be left scratching my head at this situation.
As delighted as I am with Grealish, if we can't afford to sign Kane and end up £50-£60m short I will be left scratching my head at this situation.
Even if we didn't sign Grealish we wouldn't pay what Levy is asking. It's not a case of oops we spent too much money and can't afford him now. It's a case of we have our valuation of what we think he is worth given his age etc. and we will not go over that.
Very true! :)How long for? at least it will clear any dandruff ;-)
Manchester_lalala
Well-Known Member
Even if we didn't sign Grealish we wouldn't pay what Levy is asking. It's not a case of oops we spent too much money and can't afford him now. It's a case of we have our valuation of what we think he is worth given his age etc. and we will not go over that.
Exactly.
I would argue that our need for a striker means going to £140-£150m would be worth it?Even if we didn't sign Grealish we wouldn't pay what Levy is asking. It's not a case of oops we spent too much money and can't afford him now. It's a case of we have our valuation of what we think he is worth given his age etc. and we will not go over that.
There seems little or no noise of anyone else as a back up so I can only hope we know this is defo going to happen.
For my part, I think it would be better all round for Kane to leave leave this summer.Genuine question to you mate do you actually want to keep Kane or would you rather levy come to the table and gets a fee for around £120 mill?
If I was a spurs fan I would want Kane out you have had his best years and are in need of a squad refresh. It may be painful in the short term but i think it would benefit spurs long term.
My brother is a spurs fan and he just wants him gone now for instance. Interested to get your take.
But on two conditions. Firstly, that City pay something approaching Levy's asking price (whatever that might be - but at least £130m + £30m easily achievable add-ons, IMO). Secondly, that Spurs sign a top quality up and coming replacement such as Vlahovic.
The argument was that Dortmund is a great club for young players because they let them leave. They didn't let Sancho leave last year. They made him wait.But they all had to wait longer than they wanted and footballers do not like waiting.
Of course you'll still sign good players, not everybody is going to reject spurs because of it but if you're looking at a potential superstar, they are going to have numerous offers, a team like dortmund have a reputation of sticking to their word and allowing them to move on when they agree, spurs have a reputation of being like a cage, once you're in, there's no getting out easily, that's going to bite back at some point and if there's a choice to be made between two clubs with those reputations, it's probably not going to favour spurs.