Harry Kane

Kane just came off his best ever season and Spurs didn't even get Europa League football.
They 100% should sell and re-invest in a squad of players capable of regular CL football.
Spurs simply can't afford Kane and a good squad around him, it's either or for them.
Agreed. But Spurs came pretty close to having a squad capable of challenging, with only the need to buy a £60-£70m player per season as a garnish to keep them challenging.

Hypothetically: You're Levy & City cave in & pay you the £150m you're demanding. You lose Kane, but gain the dough. Which players are you buying to replace Kane's goals & further bolster your squad?
 
Think if we go £120m + £30m achievable addons then that suits all parties and PR concerns for both sides?

Yes mate. Also think it will get done at something in that ballpark.

Levy wanted bragging rights on Kyle Walker and we were happy for him to claim it was £52m, but it was a few mill short of that until he won Prem, etc...

City can't win the PR war, which is why Pep took it upon himself to mention that Grealish only cost us £40m in real terms.

We saw with Jack, when he got back from holiday and the grown ups saw the whites of their eyes, people can talk properly, without agents and media hyperbole.
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.