Luke The Blue
Well-Known Member
I'm not so sure that we will seriously struggle mate but we do need a striker, and no not because we lost today.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
I'm not so sure that we will seriously struggle mate but we do need a striker, and no not because we lost today.
bluethrunthru
Well-Known Member
Gentleman agreements v tooth fairies.
= unicorns and sunny uplands ?
Truth is we could do with a goal scorer as evidenced tonight but Levy could lose out big time with a disgruntled Kane failing to find himself motivated enough to propel Spurs to the top of the North London league.
Bluesince88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Jun 2021
- Messages
- 980
- Team supported
- City
Thought they was getting lukaku?Irrelevant what he's worth, if we don't sign a striker we're going to seriously struggle, especially now Chelsea will have one of the world's very best banging in the goals.
Churchlawtonblue
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 3 Dec 2013
- Messages
- 13,541
What fat lukaku who cant do it in the PL. We did alright last season without a striker. Could have won more if Pep handnt tinkered.Irrelevant what he's worth, if we don't sign a striker we're going to seriously struggle, especially now Chelsea will have one of the world's very best banging in the goals.
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
http://stadiumdb.com/news/2021/02/london_spurs_in_serious_debt_over_stadium_construction
It seems Spurs are moving money around & extending their debt. It's reckoned that you can service your long term debt, but looking at the figures, it leaves little manoeuvre for major signings going forward, without major sales.
Levy is a notoriously tough negotiator, & where Kane is concerned it raises 3 questions...
1. Do Spurs GENUINELY want to keep Kane, or are they playing hardball for the £150m they want?
2. Spurs have kicked a £175m repayment to the BoE until next March, & there's talk of turning that loan into bonds to further delay its repayment. Can Spurs afford not to sell a key asset to ease short term issues exacerbated by the pandemic?
3. If Kane remains, the one major asset you have will begin to depreciate. What then? Bills still have to be paid, loans repaid & the squad kept fresh. Unless Spurs have a nursery of potential Kane's on the horizon, what's the plan to keep up with the Top 6 football squad arms race? Will Spurs fans be happy with a shiny new stadium, but no major success on the pitch & the real prospect of no Champions League football either?
My thoughts. That the creditors would apply pressure to reduce the debt especially in these times of COVID and the uncertainty of which direction this virus will take with winter approaching. Kane, Spurs main asset will depreciate unless sold in the coming months.
r.soleofsalford
Well-Known Member
Well. Back on planet earth City are outraged because Spurs won’t sell at £100m because Kane’s brother says that how much he is worth and City think an alleged gentleman’s agreement supersedes a contract. The problem is you. Not us.
No wonder Levy won’t talk to you lot until you get some grown ups involved.
"City are outraged"
Haha
Thought they was getting lukaku?
What lukaku who cant do in the PL. We did alright last season without a striker. Could have won more if Pep handnt tinkered.
The classic internet forum shit football knowledge has hit rock bottom. Yes, the Lukaku who's hit 20+ goals in 7 of his 11 seasons and got 64 goals in 95 Inter appearances. The one who's better than any City striker not called Sergio Agüero that most of us have been alive to see. Who cares if he slightly underperformed at United? So does everyone Mourinho manages.
And Pep wouldn't have had to tinker if he had a decent striker to put up front in the CL final.
manimanc
Well-Known Member
Says the fuckin 10 year old with that post.Well. Back on planet earth City are outraged because Spurs won’t sell at £100m because Kane’s brother says that how much he is worth and City think an alleged gentleman’s agreement supersedes a contract. The problem is you. Not us.
No wonder Levy won’t talk to you lot until you get some grown ups involved.
Have a word with yourself.
I hope you stay on here when we get kane.
Salty tears are the best.
SkyBlueHobgoblin
Well-Known Member
The clue was before our eyes today and delivered by Sky Sports. At around 4.00pm they were promoting next weeks games……..including Super Sunday…..Spurs v City. The head/shoulder photo at that time was Kane/King Kev. About 1 hour later……same promotion…….but head /shoulder shot was Son/King Kev. He is on his way. Not saying that I approve of it. Just saying. I think we could spend more wisely.