And Haaland doesn't have the likes of Moura, Kulusevski, Richarlison and Skipp around him.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
And Haaland doesn't have the likes of Moura, Kulusevski, Richarlison and Skipp around him.
Haaland will never be anything like the playmaker Kane often is. He is and will always be an out and out number 9. Kane is a number 9/10 hybrid. He will never get close to being able to pass a ball the way than Kane can and does. Thinking he's one day just going to be a brilliant link player (yes, it's something he can and will still improve) because he's only 22 is farcical. There are parts of Kane's game that Erling is unlikely to ever get close to. And obviously vice versa.
And all this talk about him not being in the same league is complete and utter nonsense. Are we really suggesting that Kane wouldn't be capable of scoring the 6 goals there is between him and Haaland in the Premier League this season if he played for us and not Tottenham?
I think Kane is a brilliant player and is definitely a better playmaker than Haaland now. However, to make a definitive statement that Haaland will never be anything like the playmaker Kane is is just as absurd as saying they aren't in the same league - you can't possibly know that, it's a guess, however educated you feel it is.
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 20,400
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
No way we'd have bought both kane and Haaland so it's very much a bullet dodged.
I think Kane is a brilliant player and is definitely a better playmaker than Haaland now. However, to make a definitive statement that Haaland will never be anything like the playmaker Kane is is just as absurd as saying they aren't in the same league - you can't possibly know that, it's a guess, however educated you feel it is.
Why is it a guess? Haaland isn't going to blossom into a world-class playmaker. He'll improve his link play, his hold up play etc. But he would have to improve an insane amount in those aspects which I just don't see happening. We already know his strengths and they will always be his main strengths.
Kane didn’t have the playmaking abilities he has now when he was 22…Why is it a guess? Haaland isn't going to blossom into a world-class playmaker. He'll improve his link play, his hold up play etc. But he would have to improve an insane amount in those aspects which I just don't see happening. We already know his strengths and they will always be his main strengths.
Moreover, Haaland finished the campaign with 8 assists to Kane’s 3…
Kane didn’t have the playmaking abilities he has now when he was 22…
Moreover, Haaland finished the campaign with 8 assists to Kane’s 3…
You can't just ignore the ability of the players they both have around them every week. And Kane would have had triple the assists this season if Son, the one other genuinely top player Spurs have, hadn't have been so dog shit suddenly.
Don Karleone
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 8 Nov 2008
- Messages
- 25,396
- Team supported
- Vampire Squid FC
He will make players like Rashford, Garnacho and Sancho instantly better and more effective.
I was kind of with you up until this. He's a very good footballer, not a miracle worker.
I was kind of with you up until this. He's a very good footballer, not a miracle worker.
Kane's link up play and passing ability will always make anyone around him with pace look better. That will surely benefit Rashford and Garnacho.
Not so much a bullet dodged as Kane would have been unreal for city. More like we won the euro millions and not the lotto.No way we'd have bought both kane and Haaland so it's very much a bullet dodged.
Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 Apr 2019
- Messages
- 20,400
- Team supported
- FC Zurich (and city of course)
3 times the money we paid for Haaland and a fraction of the shelf life - bullet dodged.Not so much a bullet dodged as Kane would have been unreal for city. More like we won the euro millions and not the lotto.
Mr Blue Moon
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 12 May 2013
- Messages
- 3,193
Reading your posts on this thread, I’m not sure if your Kane’s agent or his mum…You can't just ignore the ability of the players they both have around them every week. And Kane would have had triple the assists this season if Son, the one other genuinely top player Spurs have, hadn't have been so dog shit suddenly.
Why is it a guess? Haaland isn't going to blossom into a world-class playmaker. He'll improve his link play, his hold up play etc. But he would have to improve an insane amount in those aspects which I just don't see happening. We already know his strengths and they will always be his main strengths.
Of course it's a guess - you are predicting something in the future but saying it definitively. In this case, it's that in 7/8 years Haaland wouldn't be able to develop his game in the same way that Kane did over 7/8 years.
Now I don't think Haaland will necessarily develop into a playmaker at the same level, but to say he definitely won't is something we don't know.
1961_vintage
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 21 Sep 2009
- Messages
- 16,642
Newcastle would be good.He'll fit in anywhere because he's quality. He'll always score goals and if he goes to the Rags he will improve them, so let's hope he stays put.
Not denying Kane is an excellent striker and would have done a very good job for us, but still prefer Haaland. When you consider Erling's age his game will only improve under Pep's tutelage and we don't need Haaland to be a playmaker.Haaland will never be anything like the playmaker Kane often is. He is and will always be an out and out number 9. Kane is a number 9/10 hybrid. He will never get close to being able to pass a ball the way than Kane can and does. Thinking he's one day just going to be a brilliant link player (yes, it's something he can and will still improve) because he's only 22 is farcical. There are parts of Kane's game that Erling is unlikely to ever get close to. And obviously vice versa.
And all this talk about him not being in the same league is complete and utter nonsense. Are we really suggesting that Kane wouldn't be capable of scoring the 6 goals there is between him and Haaland in the Premier League this season if he played for us and not Tottenham?
wolviedinho
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 19 Oct 2010
- Messages
- 24,067
- Location
- Doublethink
- Team supported
- Super City from Maine Road(not wolves)
Just one more year arry -:)
TonyColemansbagofapples
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 24 Sep 2017
- Messages
- 6,703
Kane’s a loser, stays where he’s comfortable. Winners go to clubs that are winners and back themselves. ‘Arry is a perfect fit for the vermin at Old Scaffold but will stay at Spurs
Not denying Kane is an excellent striker and would have done a very good job for us, but still prefer Haaland. When you consider Erling's age his game will only improve under Pep's tutelage and we don't need Haaland to be a playmaker.
I prefer Haaland. My point wasn't about Kane being a better option for us. Just that he's massively disrespected still all things considered. And also anyone saying that Haaland is a much better player is talking complete biased nonsense. They are both elite players.
Haaland has been absolute streets ahead of Kane this season. the literal definition of in a different post codeHe was never going to need time to adapt to the Premier League with his physical tools and the fact that he already played in the Bundesliga, which is as close to the Premier League as you can get but with much less overall quality. It's not like he was moving from Portugal or France.
And saying Haaland is in a different postcode to him is just complete biased delusion.
xgorton
Well-Known Member
Him from down sarf,he wouldn't them up there.Newcastle would be good.