Not sure, noone else was interested of him for that money i guess.he has a few years to prove that he is that good. Still need a world class striker if we want to fight for all the titles.chelsea is getting stronger and they already beat us 3 times in a row with werner, who seems to be even worse than sterling in front of goal.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Harry Kane
- Thread starter Super Joey Hart
- Start date
supercity88
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 9 Aug 2009
- Messages
- 13,846
thats exactly whats going on here he's trying to squeez as much as he can from us then he wants add ons for goals etc,,just walk away city
We should just go and buy Haaland. City shouldn't do business with any club that want to maximise the money they get paid for someone. We're better than that.
We need to sign him, still don't get why on earth we payd 100 mil for Grealish. We need a striker more and would have spend that money and more on Kane or Haaland.
Yes, the immediate need is a striker, the club are obviously working on that and they have looked at the books and are confident they can do both.
When people post similar to what you have, I think they are missing out on a few things, both immediate and long term needs, but particularly long term. You want the striker problem solved - the club hierarchy have a few years worth of business planned out.
1. Bernardo is likely leaving.
2. Kdb is becoming more injury prone and we need another creator for when he's out.
3. Grealish is a few years younger than KDB and will be up and running by the time kdb moves on or retires.
If we don't get Kane, the problem isn't "we bought grealish and didn't have enough for kane". It's "why didn't we have a second priority to Kane". The club have a valuation of kane they are willing to pay. If they don't want to go over that, they should have an alternative in mind if levy holds his nerve.
The Grealish and kane transfers aren't dependent or link to one another. Give it a rest.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
I can only assume you have no idea as to how the transfer system works.Have to say getting slightly bored of this saga now. Either stump up or sack it off IMO.
oakiecokie
Well-Known Member
Theoretically, £40M+ has already been recouped from the sale of players to date so not a bad investment of only £60M.We need to sign him, still don't get why on earth we payd 100 mil for Grealish. We need a striker more and would have spend that money and more on Kane or Haaland.
B
B
BLUEMATT23
Guest
Be interesting to see the media narrative if he joins us.
At the moment he is pretty much untouchable, captain and saint harry etc.
Will this be spun round - saying he's a sell out, bad role model etc - basically a complete character assassination from the press.
Will this happen?
At the moment he is pretty much untouchable, captain and saint harry etc.
Will this be spun round - saying he's a sell out, bad role model etc - basically a complete character assassination from the press.
Will this happen?
sir baconface
Well-Known Member
Why has nobody else thought of this?We should just go and buy Haaland. City shouldn't do business with any club that want to maximise the money they get paid for someone. We're better than that.
Jokithedruid
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- 20 May 2012
- Messages
- 981
Will be exactly like that, and an even bigger backlash than against Grealish. Grealish has always had his critics with his off-field antics so the fall from grace hasn't been that hard. Kane has almost been knighted by the media, joining that "dirty oil-club" will be seen as a treason against the crown. Very brave by both Kane and Grealish in my eyes.Be interesting to see the media narrative if he joins us.
At the moment he is pretty much untouchable, captain and saint harry etc.
Will this be spun round - saying he's a sell out, bad role model etc - basically a complete character assassination from the press.
Will this happen?
kun
Well-Known Member
This isn't how it works. He's not a fucking pint of milk.We should just go and buy Haaland.
So we should stop doing business with literally every club in world football...City shouldn't do business with any club that want to maximise the money they get paid for someone. We're better than that.
Spurs are desperate to tie up a deal for another striker before selling Kane. Problem they've got is nobody decent wants to join Spursy. Although with Inter Milan in liquidation Martinez may not have a choice. Can see Vlahovic staying at Fiorentina for another year on an improved contract with a decent sized buy out.
Don’t get this they have to buy players before they sell, surly these clubs know or at least have an inkling that there best player is of!