Harry Kane

ken tali said:
Not sure, noone else was interested of him for that money i guess.he has a few years to prove that he is that good. Still need a world class striker if we want to fight for all the titles.chelsea is getting stronger and they already beat us 3 times in a row with werner, who seems to be even worse than sterling in front of goal.
Click to expand...
He only wanted City.
 
  • Like
Reactions: OB1
oakiecokie said:
I can only assume you have no idea as to how the transfer system works.
Click to expand...

I don't think anyone really does? But let's be honest and talk Ings to Villa (granted, not PL top scorer and England captain) but there was no press, no BS, just straight in offer made - deal done (again, not that we see what goes on behind closed doors) but that's how a transfer should be done.

I understand this is all to do with Levy, but the obvious piece is here, if we're not going to pay what they want - they aren't going to sell him.

At this rate, we're going to be starting the season with Sterling up top.
 
supercity88 said:
We were three games from a quadruple without a striker last season. Aguero was already missing in truth. Grealish makes us better so we have done what we needed to and improved an already impressive squad.

Kane clearly answers a problem for us and gives us the option to play a variety of alternative systems. We can go long to him, cross to him or play a false 9. Torres could improve and fill that role more impressively or others could. Jesus might even knuckle down and deliver.

There is no 2nd option. Haaland isn't a goer and who else is there that has a CV as impressive as Kane's? For a club that has won nowt he has scored and created a shit tonne in so many different competitions for a sustained period. The club would be panic buying if they looked anywhere else.

Others might have improved too but we have added the most creative player in the league to our squad and are trying to add the top goal scorer too. That's a fucking statement of intent to everyone in England.
Click to expand...


... So you agree with my post? For the record I think we will get Kane and don't need a back up priority.

The point of my post was that the Grealish and kane transfers aren't one or the other and everyone needs to stop going on about it. The part about having a back up was a hypothetical worst case to demonstrate grealish and kane have been budgeted and 100 million on grealish doesn't disqualify the kane transfer...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.