IMO Spurs do need to replace Kane because it will damage their morale and the direction of their club under the new coach if they keep him. Of course they will say otherwise. It is easier for Spurs to replace Kane because we are looking for an elite player. Spurs with £120m could buy 4-5 top players as Villa are doing. Ward-Prowse for example. Ings. Martinez. We might not take them but they are good players. City bought loads of players when we were in their position years ago. We didn't find it difficult. They said we bought success. We did. Spurs could too with £120m plus their own resources. Liverpool famously got stronger by selling Coutinho.Is it really that difficult for us, a big Manchester based PL club that knew for months they needed to replace a CF? Spurs doesn’t need to and weren’t planning either until Kane apparently made his wish leave kinda public.
And why replace Kane for Martial. Where’s the improvement in that?
I hope we get Kane. I prefer Haaland. But I’m not gonna judge opponent clubs or their fans who don’t like one of their best players leave to a rival.