Harry Kane

J.P said:
Spurs fan here. Doubt I’m very welcome but thought I’d risk posting in the effort to give some information from what we are hearing from the Spurs side of things.



I’m sure a lot of you are as bored as us with how long this whole thing is dragging out, and how each day a new journalist pops up claiming that ‘Kane wants to join Man City’ is somehow breaking news. Everyone has known that since the Neville interview on the golf course.



I’m guessing you have your own set of ‘itks’ like all clubs, and some are complete WUMs, while some are very credible. Well the most credible Spurs itks have all been fairly consistent on this whole saga:



  • Kane wants to leave and only wants City
  • The whole thing has been a mess from the very beginning due to the incompetence of his agent and Brother Charlie
  • Charlie got completely ahead of himself providing completely fabricated information to City of how much it would take to get Harry out of Tottenham
  • It’s widely accepted by both clubs, agents and journalists that Charlie is well out of his depth and if anything, been a complete hindrance to any deal being completed. His wedding stunt made the City side furious, and just plain baffled the Spurs side.
  • Tottenham ONLY WANT A CASH DEAL. As you can imagine there are multiple reasons to this. 1) the players City put forward are very unlikely to want to join Spurs in the first palace. 2) on the off chance they do, their wages would have to be matched or even improved to join Spurs, which would then cause a big issue with certain players in our current squad demanding parity. 3) in ‘swap deals’ the 2 clubs often have very different views on the value of players. 4) Tottenham have a new DOF who has complete control of transfers (with the exception of Kane) and is working to a plan with a set list of players, and there are no City players on that list.
  • So far, City have not offered a straight cash deal. There have only been proposals and player exchanges plus cash, which have been dismissed out of hand for reasons stated above.
  • The last 48 hours meetings between spurs and Harry’s team has resulted in amicable discussions. Harry obviously reaffirmed his desire to play for City and Pep. However the club made their stance very clear, he should be prepared to stay unless City stump up an acceptable cash only amount. His team understand this.
  • New contract very unlikely unless specific clauses added (doesn’t take a genius to work out what they would be - see Grealish)
  • Unlikely to be anymore public stunts from Harry after the late show to preseason. The public backlash again was something half-wit Charlie didn’t anticipate. Even the FA weren’t impressed after sponsors were getting agitated.
  • Good news for us all, some are saying that there has been a deadline put on all of this. City have to come up with the cash by the 23/24th to allow Spurs a week to do their business.
  • At the moment City aren’t expected to do that unless they can sell first.
  • Everyone has a different opinion of what the magic number is.


Another FYI in terms of Spurs spending and transfer funds.



  • We have currently only spent £21M. The CB Romero deal is a loan with option to buy for £42M next summer. Some media seem to be reporting we have spent loads already, don’t get sucked into that narrative.
  • Spurs have reduced our wage bill by around 500k pw with our outgoings of Bale, Alderweireld, Lamela, Rose, Vinicius, Hart, Foyth.
  • There are also rumours that we are sitting on an announcement (maybe stadium naming rights) that would see us have more money to spend that people would expect. Obviously the reason for delaying any announcement like that is to help negotiating for our incomings.


Take it all with a pinch of salt obviously like all ‘itk’ information (I’m sure a lot of you will dismiss it all). None of it is from me so don’t shoot the messenger. I just thought some of you would want to hear both sides of coin.
Click to expand...
This strikes me as an accurate portrayal.

Like all of City's deals it starts with the player doing the deal with City first, shaking hands and sitting back, leaving City as the only dog in the race.
 
Berts Neck said:
Well this is a forum and we are entitled to our own opinions and that is all they are. Your interpretation of my comments about the Covid impact on the transfer market and extrapolation that I care for other clubs is a 2+2=5 scenario.
Yes I trust our management implicitly.If we pay 150 million for Kane I will cheer and support him like all our players. I am however entitled to a personal view of his value. I think he is worth less than 150 million and I am one of the 41.5% on this site who have a differing view to you. Frankly the 150 million has been raised by journalists and he may go for less, who knows.
Either way Bibby, lets not fall out over this as these are just personal opinions lets agree to disagree, be polite and move on supporting City. It is getting a little angry on the forum and no need to be such.
Click to expand...

I would never fall out with a fellow blue over the transfer fee of a footballer. Yes we have different opinions on this but I wouldn’t fall out with you because of it. Enjoy the rest of your day
 
Impeccable One said:
IF he signs … will we become ‘The Harry Kane’ team ? …. just asking
Click to expand...
I never liked that comment from Pep, it lacked class, however it was a backwards compliment to the talents of Kane and that makes me think he knows how to get great things from the England captain within the framework of our team structure.
 
J.P said:
Spurs fan here. Doubt I’m very welcome but thought I’d risk posting in the effort to give some information from what we are hearing from the Spurs side of things.



I’m sure a lot of you are as bored as us with how long this whole thing is dragging out, and how each day a new journalist pops up claiming that ‘Kane wants to join Man City’ is somehow breaking news. Everyone has known that since the Neville interview on the golf course.



I’m guessing you have your own set of ‘itks’ like all clubs, and some are complete WUMs, while some are very credible. Well the most credible Spurs itks have all been fairly consistent on this whole saga:



  • Kane wants to leave and only wants City
  • The whole thing has been a mess from the very beginning due to the incompetence of his agent and Brother Charlie
  • Charlie got completely ahead of himself providing completely fabricated information to City of how much it would take to get Harry out of Tottenham
  • It’s widely accepted by both clubs, agents and journalists that Charlie is well out of his depth and if anything, been a complete hindrance to any deal being completed. His wedding stunt made the City side furious, and just plain baffled the Spurs side.
  • Tottenham ONLY WANT A CASH DEAL. As you can imagine there are multiple reasons to this. 1) the players City put forward are very unlikely to want to join Spurs in the first palace. 2) on the off chance they do, their wages would have to be matched or even improved to join Spurs, which would then cause a big issue with certain players in our current squad demanding parity. 3) in ‘swap deals’ the 2 clubs often have very different views on the value of players. 4) Tottenham have a new DOF who has complete control of transfers (with the exception of Kane) and is working to a plan with a set list of players, and there are no City players on that list.
  • So far, City have not offered a straight cash deal. There have only been proposals and player exchanges plus cash, which have been dismissed out of hand for reasons stated above.
  • The last 48 hours meetings between spurs and Harry’s team has resulted in amicable discussions. Harry obviously reaffirmed his desire to play for City and Pep. However the club made their stance very clear, he should be prepared to stay unless City stump up an acceptable cash only amount. His team understand this.
  • New contract very unlikely unless specific clauses added (doesn’t take a genius to work out what they would be - see Grealish)
  • Unlikely to be anymore public stunts from Harry after the late show to preseason. The public backlash again was something half-wit Charlie didn’t anticipate. Even the FA weren’t impressed after sponsors were getting agitated.
  • Good news for us all, some are saying that there has been a deadline put on all of this. City have to come up with the cash by the 23/24th to allow Spurs a week to do their business.
  • At the moment City aren’t expected to do that unless they can sell first.
  • Everyone has a different opinion of what the magic number is.


Another FYI in terms of Spurs spending and transfer funds.



  • We have currently only spent £21M. The CB Romero deal is a loan with option to buy for £42M next summer. Some media seem to be reporting we have spent loads already, don’t get sucked into that narrative.
  • Spurs have reduced our wage bill by around 500k pw with our outgoings of Bale, Alderweireld, Lamela, Rose, Vinicius, Hart, Foyth.
  • There are also rumours that we are sitting on an announcement (maybe stadium naming rights) that would see us have more money to spend that people would expect. Obviously the reason for delaying any announcement like that is to help negotiating for our incomings.


Take it all with a pinch of salt obviously like all ‘itk’ information (I’m sure a lot of you will dismiss it all). None of it is from me so don’t shoot the messenger. I just thought some of you would want to hear both sides of coin.
Click to expand...
Now this seems a sensible post

A lot better than the usual slagging off we get from other clubs fans

Fair play for posting
 
Thanks for the kind reception. Not always the case when you dip into other clubs forums!
One further thing I would say to keep in mind. There has been consistent noise that Spurs were looking at bringing in a proper striker that could play with/fill in for Kane. The club have tried to go down the cheap route or loans eg Jansen, Llorente, Vinicius in recent years which have never worked out. Investing properly in that part of the squad has been rumoured as a priority of the new DOF. With that in mind the noise our end is:
- if Kane stays, 1 striker coming in
- if Kane goes, 2 strikers coming in
I only add this because if we bring in Martinez (for example) who is nothing like the profile of Kane, and is much more a ‘second striker’ that doesn’t necessarily mean what the media will 100% spin it to be. However if we also sign a player in the mould of Vlahovic (typical number 9) then that would be very safe to assume the fat lady is about to sing on the Kane saga.
Could be completely wrong and it’s all a big bluff, and Martinez maybe means Kane is off, but it doesn’t match up logically with the clubs apparent plans.
 
Mancity1980 said:
I never liked that comment from Pep, it lacked class, however it was a backwards compliment to the talents of Kane and that makes me think he knows how to get great things from the England captain within the framework of our team structure.
Click to expand...
I think it was throwaway remark speaking in second language that he hadn't really thought about, he pulled back from it the second he realised he'd upset people.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.