Harry Kane

Pollocks OG said:
This has more or less all been agreed. Fee, wages, the lot. Final bits will be getting done now and I reckon no later than Wednesday we will get the breaking news yellow ticker on Sky Sports news saying "City have record £140 million bid accepted" (even though we know this will include the add ons).
Click to expand...
This.

imo it’s been done for a little while.
 
I personally think that if the figures being bandied about Kane are correct, then I suggest we pull out. I know he's not an out an out striker but Felix plus, say £30m for Bernardo (if he wants to go) and Rodri. Sign Bissouma and Tierney...a bit fantasy football, I know, but not convinced Kane is worth the money being talked about. Need to offload Mendy too, he really is a liability.
 
If and of course a big IF we end up with no striker then I fail to see how Ings for a year wouldn’t have been better than nothing?

Or would people just rather he played Jesus?
 
the way things were before the game had me thinking Kane would even play against Norwich lol. surprised by the lack of news. hopefully its good silence though
 
Marvin said:
Lacazette would do a better job as a central striker than any player we have and he's obtainable. Haaland, Mbappe, DCL are not.
Click to expand...
I mean his career best for goals in a season at Arsenal is 13 in the league, 19 overall. I like the player but he isn't a better central option than what we have if the concern is goals. Build up wise he's good but we've got players who can do that already.

He's also a bit worse than he used to be. That's normally the kind of thing you yourself pick up on earlier than most in a player of that age.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Unread Posts

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
✖
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.