You may be right and I know jack shit about football finances but I find it hard to believe that selling Kane is the only option Levy has to pay that. We all know how suddenly money is found by football clubs when needed. Like I said you may be right but my mind would be blown if Levy has left himself in that position and hasn't explored other avenues rather than have to sell Spurs talisman.
At £160m it's the clearest indication that it's 'buying' the next trophy!
Yep. And that is why this is starting to worry me slightly.Seems pretty simple to me this.
I consider the fee is agreed.
Spurs need to get their signings, with particular emphasis on Kane's replacement, in before they can / will allow Kane to go.
There is no way Spurs would want the clubs they are buying from to know they have "the Kane money" burning a big hole in their pockets.
Therefore, most of this signing being finalised will depend on whether Spurs can navigate their own situation.
The only way we get "shafted" is us paying more than market value - it happens or it doesn't. If it doesn’t Spurs haven't shafted us, they've just not had their valuation met for a player under contract.Dangerous approach for us, if they sign one forward and then say they are keeping Harry to play with that new striker
Sick of this Kane transfer as feel it's obvious we are going to get shafted
Hmm. 2,500 pages beg to differ.Seems pretty simple to me this.
Does the rest of Europe not get the news? Pretty sure everyone knows that if Spurs are looking to buy a striker it's because Kane is going.Seems pretty simple to me this.
I consider the fee is agreed.
Spurs need to get their signings, with particular emphasis on Kane's replacement, in before they can / will allow Kane to go.
There is no way Spurs would want the clubs they are buying from to know they have "the Kane money" burning a big hole in their pockets.
Therefore, most of this signing being finalised will depend on whether Spurs can navigate their own situation.
I’m sure the other clubs they’re buying from will have a bit of cop on by now that they’ll be using the Kane money especially the club they’re buying a striker fromSeems pretty simple to me this.
I consider the fee is agreed.
Spurs need to get their signings, with particular emphasis on Kane's replacement, in before they can / will allow Kane to go.
There is no way Spurs would want the clubs they are buying from to know they have "the Kane money" burning a big hole in their pockets.
Therefore, most of this signing being finalised will depend on whether Spurs can navigate their own situation.