Harry Kane

Surely Dortmund would tempted to sell Haaland in this transfer window if City offered them £150mill? If City sign Kane this season, then Haalnad isn't coming to City next season. And with Cavani leaving United at the end if this season, they will go in for Haalnd, which is very worrying.
I think City simply dont have £150m to spend on another transfer this season without breaking any FFP rules. To even spend £120-130m we most likely have to offload someone like Bernardo Silva. And thats assuming the sale of fringe players like Herrera go through as well.
 
Not a good alternative, an alternative would be pay Dortmund and Haaland and co whatever they want to get the deal done!
An alternative neither you nor me know is either available or affordable. Unlike the club, so either accept the clubs decision and trust they have the best long interests of the clubs future in their thinking, or don't. Just don't keep deluding yourself, Haaland is an option he isn't it's gone move on.
 
Last edited:
Hopefully Pogba leaving for free will have them in a conundrum. They will then need to replace a creative midfielder and a forward, how much will that cost them?

Not much. Pogba's wages have gone. Apparently Haaland has a low buy out clause next season. Chelsea have spent £100mill on Lukaku. We're about to blow £125mill-£150mill on Kane. Bar United, only Liverpool in the PL might go in for Haaland next season. Or Levy and Spurs with our money. ;-) I rate Kane, but this is madness. Abroad, Bayern and Madrid will also go in for Haaland.
 
Last edited:
So I’ve been given a bit more detail. The meeting is with Kane’s camp not the club, and is happening in a hotel in Hertfordshire

I don't want to pour cold water on this information but we can have as many meetings as we like with Kane and his entourage, Levy and Spurs have him on contract for three more years, that's all that counts.
 
Can't believe we're haggling over such massive transfer fees for Kane when Ings, Andre Silva, Martinez, Calvert-Lewin and Bamford either are available, or were available, this summer for significantly cheaper. We need someone who can stand in the right place and slam the ball in the net when one of our trillion attacking midfielders puts it on a place for them. We don't need to spend £130m to rectify that issue.
They’re all shit mate that’s why they’re cheaper.
Ings sold recently
Andre Silva 30 and sold recently
Martinez is a number 10 and nit good enough or the right position
Calvert-Lewin ffs he’s crap
We do need to spend that amount of money when what we’re trying to achieve requires the best of the best not average players.
Exactly how young are you Bob because based on your post you’re still being breast fed
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.