So basically we pay for young Haaland for spurs and we end up with the crippled old biddy ; )Ready to laugh? Tottenham see Haaland as the replacement to Kane. just saw it on a tottenham twitter page they held talks with Haaland in February about him replacing Kane
You don't pay all that money to get a sure-thing penalty taker. Kane is a short term answer and his injury record is troubling. Haaland being younger, and fitter (and better!) makes him much better value for money.If we get Kane id honestly never be worried about pens again.
He has missed only 2 penalties in the last 4 years. While scoring roughly 30 in that same time frame. Thats a 94% converstion rate almost as sure as you can get for the volume of pens.
The 2 misses during that time 1 came for England the other vs Liverpool in a 2-2 draw at Anfield. Where he scored another penalty to draw the game in the 95th min.
Basically if we get 10 pens a season we are scoring 9 to 10 of those a season every year.
they've become proper cuckolds..
They should afford his release clause if they sell Kane but they're not paying for his wagesReady to laugh? Tottenham see Haaland as the replacement to Kane. just saw it on a tottenham twitter page they held talks with Haaland in February about him replacing Kane
His release clause doesn't kick in until after next season. Why would Tottenham believe that Haaland would go from one team, that are fighting for a Champs League place in Germany, to another that cannot even get one in England?? Haaland like Kane, wants to win trophies, which is why he is looking at the previously mentioned clubs.They should afford his release clause if they sell Kane but they're not paying for his wages
5 years isn't my idea of short term? His injury record is hugely exaggerated.You don't pay all that money to get a sure-thing penalty taker. Kane is a short term answer and his injury record is troubling. Haaland being younger, and fitter (and better!) makes him much better value for money.