Ha ha, yeah accept anything for that useless lump. This late in the window I can see us accepting bids of 30m for Bernardo and Laporte, no way is anybody paying 60m which has been reported for Laporte. Who has that sort of money?Mendy £20 quid instead of £30
Is that the 2 year manager just starting his 6th season at City? The one the press reliably informed us wouldn't be up to it and, even if he was, would be off after 3 years because he’d be burned out and he never stayed anywhere very long?Kane is a 2 year project for a 2 year manager at an over valued price. We would be better having a 4/5 year plan.
And a raw Delap is the only natural striker out of those three, like you say Kane is a mustDont get the negativity on here about Kane.
At £130m+ yes it’s expensive but all it does is weaken our argument against other fans re spending. And we’re getting shit for not paying the fee- so fuck em. If we were in a different financial position then yeah it’s a huge risk that would have financial ramifications for years ahead- but if kane were to fail for 2/3 years we have delap to possibly fill that position or simply buy another striker- it’s not a gamble like samaras was all then years ago.
Looking at last year we were so wasteful, most of the games we dropped points we had twice as many shots as our opponents. Kane is leathal in front of goals and gives us the aerial threat that we have been missing in recent years.
Going with Jesus/Torres/delap this season is a much bigger gamble than paying near £150m for a proven goal scorer
And the same one that has guided us to a couple of trophies.....Is that the 2 year manager just starting his 6th season at City? The one the press reliably informed us wouldn't be up to it and, even if he was, would be off after 3 years because he’d be burned out and he never stayed anywhere very long?
Top man matty.I intend to brother
You're being stupid, again.Ha ha, yeah accept anything for that useless lump. This late in the window I can see us accepting bids of 30m for Bernardo and Laporte, no way is anybody paying 60m which has been reported for Laporte. Who has that sort of money?
Chelsea? Surely he’s a better option than Kounde? I’d hate to see him at another prem teamHa ha, yeah accept anything for that useless lump. This late in the window I can see us accepting bids of 30m for Bernardo and Laporte, no way is anybody paying 60m which has been reported for Laporte. Who has that sort of money?
And yet another plonker appears. Are all spurs fans as stupid as this clown?its only to CIty he is refusing to answer))), im sure he will though if you state you will pay 160 million, the conversation then will turn into the 20million in add ons on top, if city dont agree then can jog on and sign someone else, we will stick with our unhappy player, thats our problem. There is going to come a time and i dont know when perhaps that time has already passed when its too late and 160 and 20mill add ons wont be enough.