Harry Kane

[Bustergonad]

Purely based on not being a fashionable name I'd say,although that doesn't mean my perception,but I will add that where we are today,"bigger names " are welcomed more.

Back in the day Ings would have been a great signing,but these days we are looking at,or should I say pissing about with others,more superstat factor.

Sad,but true

Absolute rubbish. You think City can be as successful as they have been by worrying about the superstar status of a player not his skill and ability. Ings’ injury record and inability to go a full season without a major injury more than likely played a part

 

[Dribble]

This saga could be sorted one way or the other quite quickly. Put in a transfer request Harry & publicly show your intent.

Harry trying to protect his Spurs legacy hasn't worked, so it's time he shit or got off the pot. It worked for Fernandinho.

 

[Tugay One Cup]

Purely based on not being a fashionable name I'd say,although that doesn't mean my perception,but I will add that where we are today,"bigger names " are welcomed more.

Back in the day Ings would have been a great signing,but these days we are looking at,or should I say pissing about with others,more superstat factor.

Sad,but true

I didn't want him because I don't particularly rate him. Nothing to do with him being unfashionable.

That being said, if it was a choice between him or the twat in Turin then I'm 100% a die hard Dings fanboy.

 

[DontLookBackInAnger]

Just make Raheem a #9. Will bag 30 goals easy and save us £150m in the process.

Personally I rate Raheem really highly, but I have never seen anything to suggest he can play the central role in a forward line for the whole season.

 

[Mid Wales blue]

He should abandon the possession system then and go long ball with a big lad up front, because what works last season might not work next season, etc.

Thats why we’re trying to sign Kane! ;-)

 

[wolviedinho]

One final push fc. Fingers crossed

My eyes…can you post a warning next time you intend to use the fail ;)

 

[Marvin]

Purely based on not being a fashionable name I'd say,although that doesn't mean my perception,but I will add that where we are today,"bigger names " are welcomed more.

Back in the day Ings would have been a great signing,but these days we are looking at,or should I say pissing about with others,more superstat factor.

Sad,but true

More a case of city competing for titles and valuing 'certainty' over 'risk'. This has always been a quandary. I don't think it's a new phenomenon. The guy with a proven track record always costs more than potential.

 

[Damocles]

Not like a paragon of rational logic like yourself to misconstrue a quote and make strawman arguments to belittle the original intent.

It was moving the same logic into the absurd in order to show the holes in it.

If you want it a bit direct - just because Guardiola said that sometimes things change, doesn't mean that he meant this specific thing or this specific time or any specific thing or time. Unless your point was that Guardiola generally believes that things change in football which is a truism because things change in every industry on the planet and not really reflective of any real point

 

[JustAnotherCityFan]

Really this needs to be done by Friday I would have thought. Saturday City are playing and Sunday Spurs will be. Then won't Kane be linking up with England after that? They have a qualifier on Thursday next week.

 

[Trickyblues]

My eyes…can you post a warning next time you intend to use the fail ;)

I hate the fail too, but Jack gaughan is fairly reliable for city news