Harry Kane

We were 2 games away from a quadruple without a striker. We don't NEED a striker.
"Football is not A, B and C. What works last season will not necessarily work this season. What did not work last season, could work now. It is open, it is moving, it is like an animal, it develops. Sometimes it moves this way, sometimes it moves another way."

That's a quote from Pep Guardiola after a run of 13 wins in a row last season while playing false 9.
 
For £25m though? He guarantees maybe only 10 fewer goals than Kane guarantees this season. Are those 10 extra goals worth an extra £125m? In terms of value, Danny sings in hindsight was an excellent signing. I didn’t see it at the time because I was fixated on Haaland and then Kane. But that value for money, and buying us time to bring Delap through, wouldn’t have been the worst deal in the world. Get the ball to him in the box and he scores, it’s as simple as that!

You're bang on here regarding Ings ability to put the ball in the net. I would have loved to have signed him as an option and still gone for Kane as first choice. I genuinely thought most City fans felt he'd be a good signing, didn't know there was a pushback against it.
 
"Football is not A, B and C. What works last season will not necessarily work this season. What did not work last season, could work now. It is open, it is moving, it is like an animal, it develops. Sometimes it moves this way, sometimes it moves another way."

That's a quote from Pep Guardiola after a run of 13 wins in a row last season while playing false 9.

He should abandon the possession system then and go long ball with a big lad up front, because what works last season might not work next season, etc.
 
He should abandon the possession system then and go long ball with a big lad up front, because what works last season might not work next season, etc.
Not like a paragon of rational logic like yourself to misconstrue a quote and make strawman arguments to belittle the original intent.
 
"Football is not A, B and C. What works last season will not necessarily work this season. What did not work last season, could work now. It is open, it is moving, it is like an animal, it develops. Sometimes it moves this way, sometimes it moves another way."

That's a quote from Pep Guardiola after a run of 13 wins in a row last season while playing false 9.
What we know didn't work is this system against Tuchel's Chelsea but there was no other option but to carry on playing it. We have seen this over the years losing to some teams 2/3 times the same season. It happened with Wolves a few years back, Liverpool, Spurs, and most recently Chelsea which ultimately cost us the CL. We need a plan B and when you have a weak position (in our case a striker now, previous years a CB) it is a problem. We lost to Tuchel's Chelsea last season, in the same manner, each time.

Not saying having Kane would stop us from losing because that would be ridiculous, we can't win everything but it is how we respond to teams that have our number and I just think that having something "different" might help to provide other options other than the 4-3-3 that we usually rely on.
 
Last edited:
You're bang on here regarding Ings ability to put the ball in the net. I would have loved to have signed him as an option and still gone for Kane as first choice. I genuinely thought most City fans felt he'd be a good signing, didn't know there was a pushback against it.

Purely based on not being a fashionable name I'd say,although that doesn't mean my perception,but I will add that where we are today,"bigger names " are welcomed more.

Back in the day Ings would have been a great signing,but these days we are looking at,or should I say pissing about with others,more superstat factor.

Sad,but true
 

Don't have an account? Register now and see fewer ads!

SIGN UP
Back
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.