Harry Kane

Do you want City to go back in for Kane in January?


  • Total voters
    390
  • This poll will close: .

youngbob

Well-Known Member
Joined
18 Mar 2015
Messages
690
Probably the 224 goals in his last 344 games including more goals and assists than anyone else last season.

He maybe in poor form at the moment but he’s still a world class striker and he would score 40 goals in our team.
This "poor form" will last a very long time because his ankles are shot. Spurs have killed any chance he had for longevity. They wanted £150m for a player who can barely move anymore.
 

King Jay

Well-Known Member
Joined
29 Dec 2019
Messages
1,104
Team supported
Manchester City
They playing worse with him. Their front 3 was much more fluid with Bergwijn, Son and Lucas. But then again he might start
Scoring after next week again. I would still prefer Lautaro who also runs and defends a lot but can easily score too.
 

colesy

Well-Known Member
Joined
30 Dec 2009
Messages
922
Location
Cairns, Queensland, Australia
I agree. Bullet dodged. Who would you drop from yesterday's line up against Chelski in favour of Kane?
I definitely agree about a dodged bullet, he wasn't worth the money that they wanted, which is why we walked. However the issue is we can't keep the same starting side all season, maybe he would have done better against Southampton, when we had nine or ten shots and didn't score. I am sure he would be performing so much better this season in our team, rather than playing for that shower.
 

Dobsy

Well-Known Member
Joined
6 Jul 2011
Messages
2,325
Perhaps Txiki does know what he's doing after all.

At this point it's clear the numbers being talked about for Kane were mental. Remember Spurs fans coming on here trying to explain why he's worth £160m to them because he'll get them into the CL?
 

Don't have an account?

Register now!
Top
  AdBlock Detected
Bluemoon relies on advertising to pay our hosting fees. Please support the site by disabling your ad blocking software to help keep the forum sustainable. Thanks.