Harry Kane

[iTyler]

Who's put them through for Kane?

People are talking like Haaland would score the same amount of goals for Tottenham. He wouldn't get near to the figures he has this season playing in that side. Kane would also get close to the figures Haaland has playing for us, without any shadow of a doubt.

Nobody can change my opinion. Haaland is the better striker of the two. Kane is the better (more complete) player. Its not even open to debate really. Haaland still has some improving to do as he's just 22, of course, but I have my doubts that he'll ever be as good a pure footballer.

 

[iTyler]

Haaland had other tournaments to focus on too, and got taken off a lot just as opposition defenders were flagging. Haaland could easily have gone over 40-45 in the league if that was all he had to focus on like kane. All in his debut season while he was adapting to a team not actually devoted to setting him up for goals.

But he didn't. I'm judging him on his actual record in the Premier League, like I am with Kane for his club. I've not once said that Haaland doesn't deserve the respect and credit he's deservingly getting. But, in my opinion, Kane deserves as much praise.

 

[Tugay One Cup]

You know someone doesn't have a strong argument when they use "It's as simple as that".

Nobody can change my opinion.

Its not even open to debate really.

The duality of man.

 

[Mazzarelli's Swiss Cheese]

But he didn't. I'm judging him on his actual record in the Premier League, like I am with Kane for his club. I've not once said that Haaland doesn't deserve the respect and credit he's deservingly getting. But, in my opinion, Kane deserves as much praise.

Indeed he didn't, but that's no different to your argument about what kane would've achieved at city - he didn't, Haaland did.

 

[iTyler]

The duality of man.

So are you saying there is actually a debate that Haaland is a better footballer (not striker) than Kane right now?

And I'm supposed to take you seriously?

 

[iTyler]

Indeed he didn't, but that's no different to your argument about what kane would've achieved at city - he didn't, Haaland did.

But my original point was what he's done for Spurs this season though. I simply said he deserved as much credit as Haaland and a few people got touchy over it.

 

[citizen_maine]

So are you saying there is actually a debate that Haaland is a better footballer than Kane right now?

And I'm supposed to take you seriously?

If you don't believe there is a debate to be had, why are you continuing it?

 

[Mr Blue Moon]

Nobody can change my opinion.

…and onto ignore

 

[iTyler]

If you don't believe there is a debate to be had, why are you continuing it?

I'm just replying to what people are quoting me on.

 

[iTyler]

…and onto ignore

That's well and truly ruined my day, Mr Blue Moon.