You missed;Spurs are not selling Kane
Spurs are not selling Kane to a PL club
Spurs are not selling Kane to Manchester City
The ankle issue I get it, but 28? An issue? Come on. That’s just ridiculous. That is not an advanced age. Look at how old Ronaldo was when Juventus signed him. Lukaku is the same age and extremely fit, to the point that in 10 years he will probably still be playing at a decent levelWould be a poor value signing looking at his age (28 in July) and his ongoing ankle issues.
The ankle issue I get it, but 28? An issue? Come on. That’s just ridiculous. That is not an advanced age. Look at how old Ronaldo was when Juventus signed him. Lukaku is the same age and extremely fit, to the point that in 10 years he will probably still be playing at a decent level
Thank goodnessSpurs are not selling Kane
Spurs are not selling Kane to a PL club
Spurs are not selling Kane to Manchester City
Actually no, I made my point in the wrong thread. I should have made it in the Lukaku thread where people bring up his age as an issue too. With Kane, I do think the age makes things trickier given the history. Not with LukakuYou have just compared a freak like Ronaldo with Kane to make a point. Apples and oranges. Kane is good but not comparable to Ronaldo on any level.
Kane has been over used and he has been injured for 6 to 8 weeks in each of the last three seasons with the same issue.
Well I mean we probably do, but the club aren't doing that.You missed;
Manchester City haven’t got £150m to waste