This forum has convinced themselves that we are signing Haaland because hes a City fan. Exactly the kind of shit Utd fans spout all the time. So if it isnt him they slag off anyone else.What a nightmare signing the Premier leagues leading goalscorer.
Maybe Haaland is not obtainable. It can be simple and straightforward at times. Kane is available and it has been obvious all season we want to purchase him.At risk of sounding like a spoilt **** this is really grim. The kind of money we're getting towards here would secure Halaand. Have no idea why we're going down this route with Levy for Kane.
If we end up with Kane and Haaland went to Chelsea I think we'd very much live to regret it.
Well he did start 35 PL games last season.Injury prone and still leading goalscorer and assists
I hope he signs and shuts alot of the haaland fan boys up.
lolRather look elsewhere or give Jesus a proper go for a season to prove himself.
What’s so funny?
Haha, yes. I've never heard of it, so props to you. You're still taking shite about Kane though. :)Nope knew that word already, English O level although thought I might of spelt it wrong, Nails isn’t it good to talk. :)
I've no doubt about Kane's ability to score. It's all about fitting into the system.Oh okay. Was confused because you said you agree 100% to this post that you quoted:
Kane fits CIty's system better than Haaland would as Kane is more mobile so hes better at pressing and has better playmaking skills, so he can drop deeper.I've no doubt about Kane's ability to score. It's all about fitting into the system.
I think a figure in the region of £100m would be a big risk, even for a top class striker, if they don't fit from day one.